I have met 4 attorneys. One of the lawyers I respect the most is
recommending a 13 vs. 7. He says "do not come back if you want 7, I will only do 13". I know 13 is higher fee , + payment plan from
Heres why he said: We sold a business(A) 4 yrs ago under corpx. but put the proceeds under personal savings. Then we used the credit line under Corpx's bank accounts to fund a sole propreitor store (60k) . This gives the creditor reason to sue.
Secondly we did some balance transfers 2-3 months ago. So unless we file 9 months later or so this gives those creditors a reason to sue (27k) . Doesnot matter how frugally and business purposedly they were used.
So even though our income is negligible or nothing, he says, the creditors have much less incentive to sue under 13 since we will be asking for a payment plan etc.
Please somebody advice on your experience.
recommending a 13 vs. 7. He says "do not come back if you want 7, I will only do 13". I know 13 is higher fee , + payment plan from
Heres why he said: We sold a business(A) 4 yrs ago under corpx. but put the proceeds under personal savings. Then we used the credit line under Corpx's bank accounts to fund a sole propreitor store (60k) . This gives the creditor reason to sue.
Secondly we did some balance transfers 2-3 months ago. So unless we file 9 months later or so this gives those creditors a reason to sue (27k) . Doesnot matter how frugally and business purposedly they were used.
So even though our income is negligible or nothing, he says, the creditors have much less incentive to sue under 13 since we will be asking for a payment plan etc.
Please somebody advice on your experience.
Comment