Whether it be online, in forums such as this one, reading case law, statutes for our particular state, research is important.
I was reading BK case law rulings today all day and my eyes are bleary! but I learned some things that may effect my case.
I'm dealing with being forced into BK due to the court ordered sale of a property I live in but own only 60% of...the other 40% is owned by a very nasty ex. I didn't quibble with the court ordered sale because it allowed us to buy out each other's share at any time. However, it didn't specify that one of us (ex) could put impossible constraints on the others (my) buy out. Bottom line, there is a contract on the house for a measley amount (compared to appraised value) which wouldn't cover debt I owe to ex and his attorney (which was ordered by a very friendly to ex judge and not part of the divorce decree/orders)
But I digress:
I asked EVERY attorney versed in RE law if I could force my buying X's share based on the price of this contract that he approves but I believe is way low. (BTW, Ex is a doc married to a doc making @$700k a year and does not need this money. conversely, it is the only asset I was awarded in the divorce) Everyone said nope, no statutory right to buy out his share without his agreement.
Not true....CRS 38-28-101 partition by concurrent interest holders.
Of course I would have to file that in the same court as friendly to ex judge (I want so badly to say 'crooked' but don't want to offend anyone.)
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoo,
Could I file for BK based on the sale contract and avoid judgment liens (two of which ex filed on his own property against me) that effect my homestead.
AND THEN
Partition the regular court to partition based on that sale price to buy out ex's share?
I read that in a Ch 11, a debtor can base a reorganization on the fact he must keep the property he owes $$$ on in order to sell it to pay off debts. Do BK rules for 11 ever get applied to a 13? (Meaning that in order to pay off my unsecured creditors I need to keep the house and market it so that it will bring in enough to cover my debts.
Boy, would that help this girl out! I'm so distraught that I might be homeless in 30 days that I can hardly stop crying to read that dang case law!
I was reading BK case law rulings today all day and my eyes are bleary! but I learned some things that may effect my case.
I'm dealing with being forced into BK due to the court ordered sale of a property I live in but own only 60% of...the other 40% is owned by a very nasty ex. I didn't quibble with the court ordered sale because it allowed us to buy out each other's share at any time. However, it didn't specify that one of us (ex) could put impossible constraints on the others (my) buy out. Bottom line, there is a contract on the house for a measley amount (compared to appraised value) which wouldn't cover debt I owe to ex and his attorney (which was ordered by a very friendly to ex judge and not part of the divorce decree/orders)
But I digress:
I asked EVERY attorney versed in RE law if I could force my buying X's share based on the price of this contract that he approves but I believe is way low. (BTW, Ex is a doc married to a doc making @$700k a year and does not need this money. conversely, it is the only asset I was awarded in the divorce) Everyone said nope, no statutory right to buy out his share without his agreement.
Not true....CRS 38-28-101 partition by concurrent interest holders.
Of course I would have to file that in the same court as friendly to ex judge (I want so badly to say 'crooked' but don't want to offend anyone.)
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoo,
Could I file for BK based on the sale contract and avoid judgment liens (two of which ex filed on his own property against me) that effect my homestead.
AND THEN
Partition the regular court to partition based on that sale price to buy out ex's share?
I read that in a Ch 11, a debtor can base a reorganization on the fact he must keep the property he owes $$$ on in order to sell it to pay off debts. Do BK rules for 11 ever get applied to a 13? (Meaning that in order to pay off my unsecured creditors I need to keep the house and market it so that it will bring in enough to cover my debts.
Boy, would that help this girl out! I'm so distraught that I might be homeless in 30 days that I can hardly stop crying to read that dang case law!
Comment