Long time lurker, first time poster...
My wife and I are jointly filing and have already met with 2 attorneys. Currently, I own a 2012 Mazda 3 with 55k mileage, 95% of that is highway miles from the work commute. I owe 16K on it. My wife has a paid off 2008 Subaru with 100K miles. Obviously, one of the biggest concerns is how long my wife's vehicle will last into the bankruptcy, and our ability to get a car loan if her vehicle needs to be replaced. Our FICO are still relatively decent enough to get a good loan rate.
So, the first attorney says, in not so many words, that it would be in our best interest to get a newer vehicle to replace my wife's car. He said that he has had clients get car loans a couple of years after chapter 7, but the interest rates were extrememly high. He told me not to worry about my vehicle, despite the fact I never even thought about replacing my car. I was told that the purchase could delay filing for upwards of 90 days.
The second attorney told us to replace both cars, but keep the loans in the $300-400 range for each. I was a bit taken back by his recommendation. Again my car is 2.5 years old and I am not looking at getting rid of it. Is it common, or for that matter in our best interest, to replace both vehicles before filing? Won't a trustee and the judge have a major issue with that? The attorney said the loans would benefit us in the deductions portion to meet the median? We are roughly within $1000 over the median fo the household.
Any input would be greatly appreciated...
My wife and I are jointly filing and have already met with 2 attorneys. Currently, I own a 2012 Mazda 3 with 55k mileage, 95% of that is highway miles from the work commute. I owe 16K on it. My wife has a paid off 2008 Subaru with 100K miles. Obviously, one of the biggest concerns is how long my wife's vehicle will last into the bankruptcy, and our ability to get a car loan if her vehicle needs to be replaced. Our FICO are still relatively decent enough to get a good loan rate.
So, the first attorney says, in not so many words, that it would be in our best interest to get a newer vehicle to replace my wife's car. He said that he has had clients get car loans a couple of years after chapter 7, but the interest rates were extrememly high. He told me not to worry about my vehicle, despite the fact I never even thought about replacing my car. I was told that the purchase could delay filing for upwards of 90 days.
The second attorney told us to replace both cars, but keep the loans in the $300-400 range for each. I was a bit taken back by his recommendation. Again my car is 2.5 years old and I am not looking at getting rid of it. Is it common, or for that matter in our best interest, to replace both vehicles before filing? Won't a trustee and the judge have a major issue with that? The attorney said the loans would benefit us in the deductions portion to meet the median? We are roughly within $1000 over the median fo the household.
Any input would be greatly appreciated...
Comment