Hi there,
I read the thread on Reaffirmation, but I want more specifically to know your personal experience from reaffirming or NOT reaffirming.
My lawyer doesnt recommend it, nor, he says, do most attorneys in AZ. I am current, keeping the house and car (chapter 7) and had my 341 hearing today which was quick and painless.
I see the pros to not reaffirming. The con I see is the fact that the bank wont report my payments to the credit bureaus. But whatever, I am keeping my car current so that should help some.
Doesnt really make sense to put myself at risk by reaffirming a house that I am in the HOLE with (the housing crash dropped my home value to $110,000 and I owe $208,000 on the loan)!! I wouldnt want the bank to be able to come after me later for the difference of the sale price and what I owe (IF i leave the house, which in this state, you really have to leave it literally. The equity wont be back for years!).
Thats how I see things. Am I missing something?
Thanks!!
I read the thread on Reaffirmation, but I want more specifically to know your personal experience from reaffirming or NOT reaffirming.
My lawyer doesnt recommend it, nor, he says, do most attorneys in AZ. I am current, keeping the house and car (chapter 7) and had my 341 hearing today which was quick and painless.
I see the pros to not reaffirming. The con I see is the fact that the bank wont report my payments to the credit bureaus. But whatever, I am keeping my car current so that should help some.
Doesnt really make sense to put myself at risk by reaffirming a house that I am in the HOLE with (the housing crash dropped my home value to $110,000 and I owe $208,000 on the loan)!! I wouldnt want the bank to be able to come after me later for the difference of the sale price and what I owe (IF i leave the house, which in this state, you really have to leave it literally. The equity wont be back for years!).
Thats how I see things. Am I missing something?
Thanks!!
Comment