We listed our home for sale prior to filing a Chapter 7. By the time of our BK hearing, a sale was pending and in fact closed about a week following the hearing. During the hearing, the UST was informed of the pending market price sale, and he allowed the sale of the home. Upon closing, the 1st mortgage of $286,000 was then paid in full, and we received no homestead exemption or proceeds of any kind from this sale. If the $286,000 from the mortgage is deducted from our total debt, then our non-consumer debt accounts for 74% of all remaining debt, qualifying us for a Ch 7 discharge. However, if the $286,000 from the Mortgage is included as consumer debt, then our debt becomes primarily consumer debt and we face Ch 7 dismissal and a Ch 13 payment plan over the next 5 years. Because our case was originally filed with the debt from the 1st Mortgage listed among our secured consumer debts, does the amount of the 1st mortgage still get added to our total consumer debt, even though the home sold and the debt from 1st mortgage no longer exists?
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Home Sold After Filing
Collapse
X
-
This si a new one on me. I thought NON consumer debt was business debt there are people on the board that don't own a house and up to their ears in debt. and they are in chapter 7. you may have messed yourself up if you used the payment on the house to Qualify for chapter 7 and now you no longer have it. Did you end up with a lot of disposable income?Chapter 7 07/30/2008
341 09/17/2008
Discharge 11/21/2008
-
Not enough information here. I'd have to know a lot more about your situation. Non consumer debt is business debt. If you have significant business debt then yes it could affect status. This is probably something to ask your lawyer if you filed with one.
Keep in mind if the home sold the trustee could challenge any expense for it, though you could replace that with what you are paying in rent now or new mortgage if you have one.May 31st, 2007: Petition Filed by my lawyer
July 2nd, 2007: 341 Meeting Held
September 4th, 2007: Discharged and Closed.
Comment
-
My interpretation would be that based on the wording in Title 11, the "debt you are seeking to discharge" is primarily non-consumer debt. You are no longer seeking to discharge that $286,000, so you are immune to the 707(b) dismissal for presumption of abuse. Your petition should be amended to exclude this debt.
Comment
-
Thanks, Help! - That's exactly what I asked my attorney to do, but for some reason (undisclosed to me) my attorney says I'm stuck with the numbers we originally filed. Does anyone know why we couldn't file an amendment, or better yet, does anyone know for certain that we CAN file an amended petition?
Here's another thought. My attorney was aware of the offer on our home BEFORE we filed. If he had advised me to wait until after the home sale closed, we could have filed the Ch 7 petition without having the mortgage included in my consumer debt. This would have completely eliminated this issue altogether and I would have breezed through a Ch7 discharge. Does this sound like a bit of an oversight to anyone else?
Comment
-
Originally posted by PCHwy_Rock View PostThanks, Help! - That's exactly what I asked my attorney to do, but for some reason (undisclosed to me) my attorney says I'm stuck with the numbers we originally filed. Does anyone know why we couldn't file an amendment, or better yet, does anyone know for certain that we CAN file an amended petition?
Here's another thought. My attorney was aware of the offer on our home BEFORE we filed. If he had advised me to wait until after the home sale closed, we could have filed the Ch 7 petition without having the mortgage included in my consumer debt. This would have completely eliminated this issue altogether and I would have breezed through a Ch7 discharge. Does this sound like a bit of an oversight to anyone else?
And so it was.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TEW View PostI thought NON consumer debt was business debt
not all nonconsumer debts are dischargeable, but they do all count towards the 51% or more of total debts owed that are required to prove the 'primarily nonconsumer debt' statement true and avoid the presumption of abuse under the 707 code.Last edited by soleprop; 10-23-2008, 09:41 PM.Filed 7/28/08, Discharged 10/29/08
(filed pro se: nonconsumer no asset CH7)
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment