Wife's job was $100 short last now. They run a unified till (4 to 6 people run on one register till for up to 16 hours at a time). Last night 5 people (counting her) ran on this till. She talked to her boss (who was one of the 5 on the till) and was told that the shift-supervisor (my wife) could be terminated under the "lane accountability" policy.
The head office says they can find who created the shortage and how, but they might still fire whoever the person on the schedule was listed as "supervisor for the front end". And that regardless of the person that cause it, the shift supervisor will be written up and termed for a "cash loss of $100 or more due to negligence". The person that caused it would be terminated for "Poor Cash Handling"-- a "lesser crime" in the handbook
I'm not even sure that's it's legal to fire her that way. And if they did, I'm pretty sure she 1) get her unemployment-- we're in TN; 2) She be able to sue.
So now we're sitting here waiting for the phone to ring to see what happens next.
The head office says they can find who created the shortage and how, but they might still fire whoever the person on the schedule was listed as "supervisor for the front end". And that regardless of the person that cause it, the shift supervisor will be written up and termed for a "cash loss of $100 or more due to negligence". The person that caused it would be terminated for "Poor Cash Handling"-- a "lesser crime" in the handbook
I'm not even sure that's it's legal to fire her that way. And if they did, I'm pretty sure she 1) get her unemployment-- we're in TN; 2) She be able to sue.
So now we're sitting here waiting for the phone to ring to see what happens next.
Comment