As has been stated earlier, the C02 hasn't gone anywhere even though some of us have cold porches this month.
I think if our C02 level remained constant, things would be fine. We need to remember that God's "balanced world" has a LOT of C02 tied up underground in rock. That's why burning oil is kinda not cool. We can freely burn all the vegetable oil we want, all day long, and keep our homes at 95degrees without adding more C02. Could one propose that respecting God's balance means keeping that C02 underground where He put it in the first place?
It's cold here in Michigan, and it was a cold summer. But what about the rest of the world's weather? I'd like to know the status of the areas most affected by what's happened thus far. Drought in Africa, the melting in Greenland, the Inuits in Alaska who have been having trouble getting around the last 10 years, and the retraction of Glacier Natl' park come to mind.
It's interesting to hear a lot of my friends talk positively about "creation" but they go from Jekyl to Hyde when you change the word "creation" to "environment". It's the same thing, but I think perhaps the second one holds us accountable to our beliefs.
I think if our C02 level remained constant, things would be fine. We need to remember that God's "balanced world" has a LOT of C02 tied up underground in rock. That's why burning oil is kinda not cool. We can freely burn all the vegetable oil we want, all day long, and keep our homes at 95degrees without adding more C02. Could one propose that respecting God's balance means keeping that C02 underground where He put it in the first place?
It's cold here in Michigan, and it was a cold summer. But what about the rest of the world's weather? I'd like to know the status of the areas most affected by what's happened thus far. Drought in Africa, the melting in Greenland, the Inuits in Alaska who have been having trouble getting around the last 10 years, and the retraction of Glacier Natl' park come to mind.
It's interesting to hear a lot of my friends talk positively about "creation" but they go from Jekyl to Hyde when you change the word "creation" to "environment". It's the same thing, but I think perhaps the second one holds us accountable to our beliefs.
Comment