top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Commuter lanes......

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Commuter lanes......

    As you all know most large cities have commuter lanes authorizing cars with two or more people inside to use them.
    Is a baby securely seated in a car seat/baby carrier considered a person for commuter lane privilege purposes?

    #2
    Originally posted by magyar123 View Post
    As you all know most large cities have commuter lanes authorizing cars with two or more people inside to use them.
    Is a baby securely seated in a car seat/baby carrier considered a person for commuter lane privilege purposes?
    A child is a person. Otherwise, commuter laws would read two or more adults.

    However, they read, two or more persons.

    (And, since this is a full service bulletin board, I'll go one further. A child, unrestrained, and jumping around on the back seat... is also considered a passenger for purposes of the HOV restrictions. )
    Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
    Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
    Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

    Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by justbroke View Post
      A child is a person. Otherwise, commuter laws would read two or more adults.

      However, they read, two or more persons.

      (And, since this is a full service bulletin board, I'll go one further. A child, unrestrained, and jumping around on the back seat... is also considered a passenger for purposes of the HOV restrictions. )
      I'd have that brats bottom warmed, real fast. 'Hub
      If I knew it all, would I be here?? Hang in there = Retained attorney 8-06, Filed 12-28-07, Discharge 8-13-08, Finally CLOSED 11-3-09, 3-31-10 AP Dismissed, Informed by incompetent lawyer of CLOSED status, October 14, 2010.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by magyar123 View Post
        As you all know most large cities have commuter lanes authorizing cars with two or more people inside to use them.
        Is a baby securely seated in a car seat/baby carrier considered a person for commuter lane privilege purposes?
        ---------------------------------
        I'm sure it would because there are folks in those lanes taking small kids to school buckled up in seat belts during early morning rush hour also. Your state's motor vehicle dept. can easily answer that question for you. Your posting made me recall the person I believe in Oregon or Washington who got caught using a blow up doll as a person in the front seat so he could use those lanes each day - made national news.
        _________________________________________
        Filed 5 Year Chapter 13: April 2002
        Early Buy-Out: April 2006
        Discharge: August 2006

        "A credit card is a snake in your pocket"

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by AngelinaCatHub View Post
          I'd have that brats bottom warmed, real fast. 'Hub
          Frankly, I'd have that idiot drivers butt cited.

          Yes, kids do get out of those seats, but the driver has the ultimate responsibility.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Genenco View Post
            Frankly, I'd have that idiot drivers butt cited.

            Yes, kids do get out of those seats, but the driver has the ultimate responsibility.
            It is ROUTINE around here to see someone with a small child unrestrained in the vehicle. Apparently the police do not do anything about it. I have been passed on the highway by a vehicle doing in excess of 70 mph before, with a small boy standing up in the back floorboard between the bucket seats. I have seen people driving with small babies on their laps here in town.
            My kids have always been buckled in, even if we were just going from one parking lot to another directly across the street. And I have stopped and given a few swats when they got out of their seatbelts. Usually only happened once or twice before they got the picture.
            Chapter 13 filed -8/12/04
            Plan approved- 7/11/05
            Date discharged--10-12-2007
            Date closed- 12/6/2007:yes2::yes2:

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Genenco View Post
              Frankly, I'd have that idiot drivers butt cited.

              Yes, kids do get out of those seats, but the driver has the ultimate responsibility.
              If I knew it all, would I be here?? Hang in there = Retained attorney 8-06, Filed 12-28-07, Discharge 8-13-08, Finally CLOSED 11-3-09, 3-31-10 AP Dismissed, Informed by incompetent lawyer of CLOSED status, October 14, 2010.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by arkienurse View Post
                It is ROUTINE around here to see someone with a small child unrestrained in the vehicle. Apparently the police do not do anything about it. I have been passed on the highway by a vehicle doing in excess of 70 mph before, with a small boy standing up in the back floorboard between the bucket seats. I have seen people driving with small babies on their laps here in town.
                My kids have always been buckled in, even if we were just going from one parking lot to another directly across the street. And I have stopped and given a few swats when they got out of their seatbelts. Usually only happened once or twice before they got the picture.
                If I knew it all, would I be here?? Hang in there = Retained attorney 8-06, Filed 12-28-07, Discharge 8-13-08, Finally CLOSED 11-3-09, 3-31-10 AP Dismissed, Informed by incompetent lawyer of CLOSED status, October 14, 2010.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I'm sorry to have caused a minor diversion in the thread.

                  Apparently, my full service comment on children, restrained or not, are still considered in the count for commuters in an HOV lane, has caused this.

                  I apologize.
                  Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
                  Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
                  Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

                  Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by justbroke View Post
                    I'm sorry to have caused a minor diversion in the thread.

                    Apparently, my full service comment on children, restrained or not, are still considered in the count for commuters in an HOV lane, has caused this.

                    I apologize.
                    Hey don't, you caused a very cordial and meaty discussion. 'Hub
                    If I knew it all, would I be here?? Hang in there = Retained attorney 8-06, Filed 12-28-07, Discharge 8-13-08, Finally CLOSED 11-3-09, 3-31-10 AP Dismissed, Informed by incompetent lawyer of CLOSED status, October 14, 2010.

                    Comment

                    bottom Ad Widget

                    Collapse
                    Working...
                    X