top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. has abandoned more than a thousand debt-collection lawsuits

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. has abandoned more than a thousand debt-collection lawsuits

    June 24, 2011

    J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. has abandoned more than a thousand debt-collection lawsuits across the U.S. that sought to recover soured credit-card loans from borrowers.

    The nation's second-largest bank by assets, including more than $100 billion in credit-card accounts, wouldn't disclose the number of cases dismissed or the reasons for the move. State judges said the bank has dropped lawsuits targeting borrowers in California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey and New York since April.

    In those five states, J.P. Morgan was owed $45.9 billion on outstanding credit cards as of March 31, including both current and delinquent accounts.

    Thomas Donnelly, an Illinois state-court judge in Chicago, said lawyers for J.P. Morgan asked to withdraw all the pending collection cases in his courtroom this month, without explaining their decision. He allowed the bank to dismiss the cases without prejudice, meaning J.P. Morgan can refile them later.

    At least for now, though, the borrowers won't be subject to one of the most effective debt-collection tools. Roughly 94% of collection cases filed against borrowers result in default judgments in favor of the lender, according to industry estimates.

    J.P. Morgan spokesman Paul Hartwick wouldn't confirm or deny the lawsuit dismissals. In a statement, he said the New York bank considers "our collections strategy to be proprietary."

    Mitch Granat, a lawyer who handles debt-collection cases for J.P. Morgan in Palm Beach County, Fla., on a contract basis, said he was told by other lawyers for the bank that the suits in Florida were dropped because of "irregularities" in paperwork used to verify the validity of the credit-card debt being pursued. Some judges have complained that J.P. Morgan and other credit-card issuers that go to court to collect what they are owed file lawsuits marred by sloppy or even fraudulent documentation of debts. J.P. Morgan hasn't been accused of wrongdoing related to credit-card cases in any court filings.

    It isn't clear how common the problem is, though Philip Straniere, a state-court judge in Richmond County, N.Y., and other judges say deficiencies are worse than in foreclosure cases. "It's a significant problem…that's widespread and yet given virtually no attention," Judge Straniere said. Last year, Judge Straniere dismissed 150 credit-card-collection suits filed by J.P. Morgan, concluding paperwork submitted by the bank "appeared to be signed in large numbers by only a few individuals."

    "Robo-signing," in which employees sign documents without reviewing them, sometimes hundreds of documents a day, unleashed the nationwide investigation of questionable foreclosure practices by mortgage lenders and servicers. J.P. Morgan is being scrutinized as part of the probe. The bank has said it hasn't discovered any faulty paperwork that resulted in wrongful foreclosures. State and federal officials are negotiating a settlement to the investigation of foreclosures that is likely to cost the companies more than $5 billion, according to company estimates. J.P. Morgan has said it is cooperating with regulators.

    The amount of bad credit-card debt soared as a result of job losses and plummeting real-estate values. While the number of borrowers now falling behind on their payments is shrinking, J.P. Morgan and other credit-card issuers are working to collect older debts that went bad. Lenders usually file suits against borrowers only after phone calls, letters and other collection efforts fail.

    The average amount sought in credit-card lawsuits is roughly $1,000, according to some judges who decide such cases.

    Many lenders farm out debt-collection lawsuits to outside law firms. In contrast, J.P. Morgan predominantly uses a team of in-house lawyers scattered across the U.S. Last month, some of those lawyers say they were told by company officials that all the collection offices where they work will be shut down by the start of 2012. J.P. Morgan declined to comment.

    In a federal-court lawsuit filed last year against J.P. Morgan in San Antonio, a former assistant vice president at the bank who worked on sales of delinquent credit-card loans, alleged that employees known as "attorney liaisons" signed "multiple stacks of affidavits" filed as part of credit-card lawsuits without "looking at any accounts at all."

    The former J.P. Morgan assistant vice president, Linda Almonte, made similar claims in a whistleblower complaint filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission last year. The SEC hasn't responded to the claims. Mr. Hartwick, the J.P. Morgan spokesman, declined to comment on Ms. Almonte's allegations.

    J.P. Morgan and Ms. Almonte agreed in April to settle her federal-court suit, which alleged she was fired after telling her bosses that nearly half the 23,000 accounts in a $200 million credit-card debt sale were missing proof of court judgments the bank claimed it had won.

    Thousands of the accounts contained incorrect information about how much the borrower owed, she alleged. Terms of the settlement weren't disclosed. J.P. Morgan denied wrongdoing.

    In April, Dale Pittman, a lawyer in Petersburg, Va., cited one of the J.P. Morgan attorney liaisons accused in Ms. Almonte's lawsuit of mishandling paperwork as part of Mr. Pittman's efforts to dismiss a credit-card case against his client.

    Documents filed by J.P. Morgan as part of the debt-collection lawsuit included an affidavit signed by the attorney liaison, according to Virginia state-court records. J.P. Morgan later withdrew the case, records show. J.P. Morgan declined to comment on the case.

    Lawyers who represent credit-card borrowers sued by J.P. Morgan said they have never seen the bank throw out so many debt-collection lawsuits at once. The cases were dropped starting in April and as recently as this week, according to lawyers and judges in the five states where J.P. Morgan has dismissed credit-card lawsuits.

    Erik Kardatzke, a consumer-defense lawyer in Miami, said J.P. Morgan walked away during the past month from both of the pending lawsuits against borrowers he represents. The bank withdrew at least hundreds of additional cases in Florida, according to other lawyers.

    Filed/discharged/closed Chapter 7 in 2010!

    #2
    Had a Chase lawsuit against me - I answered summons, requested documents, after 90 days case dismissed by Chase.
    "I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY!" Ch 7 Filed 7/15/11 * 3 Minute 341 8/19/11 * Discharged 10/20/11

    Comment


      #3
      They are regrouping! They may have issues with final summary judgments (due to default) just like the mortgage side of the house. Just speculating.
      Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
      Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
      Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

      Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Freddy03 View Post
        Had a Chase lawsuit against me - I answered summons, requested documents, after 90 days case dismissed by Chase.
        excellent!!!!
        8/4/2008 MAKE SURE AND VISIT Tobee's Blogs! http://www.bkforum.com/blog.php?32727-tobee43 and all are welcome to bk forum's Florida State Questions and Answers on BK http://www.bkforum.com/group.php?groupid=9

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by justbroke View Post
          They are regrouping! They may have issues with final summary judgments (due to default) just like the mortgage side of the house. Just speculating.

          jb, can they regroup and then re- sue some of these cases...no?? right? if the court dismissed the case?
          8/4/2008 MAKE SURE AND VISIT Tobee's Blogs! http://www.bkforum.com/blog.php?32727-tobee43 and all are welcome to bk forum's Florida State Questions and Answers on BK http://www.bkforum.com/group.php?groupid=9

          Comment


            #6
            Dumb question:
            If they dismiss, does that mean you get a 1099?

            Keep On Smilin'

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by tobee43 View Post
              jb, can they regroup and then re- sue some of these cases...no?? right? if the court dismissed the case?
              Yes they can re-file at a later date if the judge assigned to the case dismisses the case without prejudice, now if you have a judge who dismisses the case with prejudice then JPM/Chase can NOT re-file.
              Filed Pro Se: 11.12.2010 ~ 341: 1.12.2011 ~ Discharged: 3.9.2011 ~ Officially an Asset Case: 3.30.2011 ~ Last Day to File Asset Claim: 6.28.2011 ~ Trustee Final Report: 8.1.2011 ~ Asset Distribution: 8.31.2011 ~ Case Close: 11.15.2011

              Comment


                #8
                Amazing - what's even more amazing - and I don't ever want people to lose their jobs, is that these collection lawyers will lose their jobs as these offices will be 'consolidated' - to India?? - in 2012....wonder if they'll ever be on the wrong end of a phone...

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by DesdemonaB View Post
                  Yes they can re-file at a later date if the judge assigned to the case dismisses the case without prejudice, now if you have a judge who dismisses the case with prejudice then JPM/Chase can NOT re-file.
                  unreal isn't that??? if you or i defaulted where and what would happen to us???
                  8/4/2008 MAKE SURE AND VISIT Tobee's Blogs! http://www.bkforum.com/blog.php?32727-tobee43 and all are welcome to bk forum's Florida State Questions and Answers on BK http://www.bkforum.com/group.php?groupid=9

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Eaxctly.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      The nation's second-largest bank by assets, including more than $100 billion in credit-card accounts, wouldn't disclose the number of cases dismissed or the reasons for the move.

                      Thomas Donnelly, an Illinois state-court judge in Chicago, said lawyers for J.P. Morgan asked to withdraw all the pending collection cases in his courtroom this month, without explaining their decision.




                      Once again my gut feeling on the reason is they most likely sold all this bad debt to the Federal reserve and Chase was made whole again.

                      Chase is the largest shareholder of the fed. They also survived the financial crisis of 2007-2009 with record profits probably for the same reason.
                      The essence of freedom is the proper limitation of Government

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Robosigning is the rule not the exception in debt cases.
                        filed chapter 13..confirmed...converted to chapter 7...DISCHARGED!

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Once again my gut feeling on the reason is they most likely sold all this bad debt to the Federal reserve and Chase was made whole again.

                          Chase is the largest shareholder of the fed. They also survived the financial crisis of 2007-2009 with record profits probably for the same reason.[/QUOTE]


                          I would guess that you are right. The buyout of NCB by PNC was arranged by the US Treasury early in this banking mess, and the reason we were put into bankruptcy, more than 6 businesses and more than 100 jobs destroyed was because the FDIC would then have had to pay out any lawsuit wins. By the Treasury paying billions in TARP to PNC to take over NCB, they Added the power and money of government lawyers to the mix (along with the apparent fraud committed by NCB and its outside counsel to bankrupt anyone with standing to sue), making it impossible for any "little fish or group of little fishes" to act against them.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I'm not sure how it's worth it to put in the lawyer's time to even process the paperwork and stand up in front a judge, etc., to get a judgement for only $1K. Of course, if they are robosigning, then I guess it becomes a bit easier. And I have a hunch that they are just looking for the default judgements so that they can levy any bank account they can their greedy little hands on.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by JackBondLove View Post
                              I'm not sure how it's worth it to put in the lawyer's time to even process the paperwork and stand up in front a judge, etc., to get a judgement for only $1K. Of course, if they are robosigning, then I guess it becomes a bit easier. And I have a hunch that they are just looking for the default judgements so that they can levy any bank account they can their greedy little hands on.
                              Because lovely folks like Zwicker, Glasser and Glasser, etc., send ONE person to "try" say the 300 cases they've got in one day - 75% say are defaults, the rest, well that's a crapshoot for them, but - 75% success rate for paying some character to show up in court...for one day...

                              Again, NOT logical at all though Jack.

                              Comment

                              bottom Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X