top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tentative Deal Set on Chrysler Debt to Avert Bankuptcy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Tentative Deal Set on Chrysler Debt to Avert Bankuptcy

    April 28, 2009

    The Treasury Department has worked out a preliminary agreement with Chrysler’s largest secured creditors that, if approved, may keep the company out of bankruptcy court, two people briefed on the matter said on Tuesday.

    Chrysler has about $6.9 billion in secured debt owned by big banks such as Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase and a group of hedge funds. Under the proposal, all of the debt would be canceled in exchange for $2 billion in cash, according to these people.

    The Treasury drew up the latest proposal in consultation with Chrysler’s biggest secured creditors, which hold about 70 percent of the company’s secured debt. It requires approval by almost all of the secured lenders. That could be difficult as some lenders, including several hedge funds, may hold their ground and reject it.

    The proposal is now being reviewed by all of the secured lenders, according to those briefed on it. These people cautioned that even if a deal is reached with the secured lenders, Chrysler could still face bankruptcy.

    If a deal is reached, it would amount to creditors being paid about 28 cents on the dollar for their outstanding debt. That’s a premium to where the debt is currently trading in the market, but much less than the 60 cents on the dollar that creditors originally said they wanted. The Treasury was originally looking for around 22 cents to 25 cents on the dollar.

    The two sides had been far apart in negotiations ahead of a Thursday deadline, but they have significantly narrowed the gap in recent days. The most recent agreement was hammered out late on Monday night as the creditors waited for a response to their most recent proposal submitted on Friday.

    Over the weekend, Chrysler reached a deal with the United Auto Workers in which the union would own a 55 percent stake in the newly reorganized automaker. The Italian automaker Fiat and the government would likely own the rest. The agreement with the U.A.W. must be ratified by union members.

    The agreement with the U.A.W. relieves Chrysler of a portion of the $10 billion it owes to the union’s retiree health fund. In exchange for giving up its claims to some of that $10 billion, the union is getting the significant equity stake in the company.

    Source:
    New York Times
    By ZACHERY KOUWE and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN

    Last edited by Flamingo; 04-30-2009, 02:15 AM. Reason: To conform with forum posting rules - OP please take note
    Filed CH 7 9/30/2008
    Discharged Jan 5, 2009! Closed Jan 18, 2009

    I am not an attorney. None of my advice is legal advice in any way..

    #2
    Oops, I guess that failed. As did chrysler.
    anybody see how obama tried to spin it as the hedge fund peoples fault? I don't blame the hedges one bit. Hey will you take 30 cents on the dollar while the unions get 50 cents? Plus they would make more if the damn thing got sold off. Its not their business to lose money.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Brighterdays View Post
      Oops, I guess that failed. As did chrysler.
      anybody see how obama tried to spin it as the hedge fund peoples fault? I don't blame the hedges one bit. Hey will you take 30 cents on the dollar while the unions get 50 cents? Plus they would make more if the damn thing got sold off. Its not their business to lose money.
      So it would be more fair for the unions to get 50 cents and the hedge fund holders to get $1.00? There's got to be give somewhere. The unions gave up to get their 50 cents. The hedge fund holders weren't willing to give up anything - they were holding out for a better deal. Thus bankruptcy for Chrysler was left as the only option remaining.

      See the details here at http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...official-says/ (yes, that's at Fox News, the conservative folks, BD, so hopefully you'll believe what's said about what really happened in this situation here.)
      I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.

      06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
      06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
      07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
      10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
      01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
      09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
      06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
      08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !

      10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
      Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by lrprn View Post
        So it would be more fair for the unions to get 50 cents and the hedge fund holders to get $1.00? There's got to be give somewhere. The unions gave up to get their 50 cents. The hedge fund holders weren't willing to give up anything - they were holding out for a better deal. Thus bankruptcy for Chrysler was left as the only option remaining.

        See the details here at http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...official-says/ (yes, that's at Fox News, the conservative folks, BD, so hopefully you'll believe what's said about what really happened in this situation here.)
        Uh, yes. The Hedge funds (bondholders) are first in line. They didn't invest their money to just step aside and let somebody else cut in front of them. They actually will get more money if it goes through ch7 and is sold off into peices. Openhiemer is one of the Hedgefunds. OppenheimerFunds and its controlled affiliates offer a broad range of products and services to individuals, corporations and institutions, including mutual funds, separately managed accounts, investment management for institutions, hedge fund products, qualified retirement plans and subadvisory investment-management services.

        It is actually a breach of contract and they could be sued by their investors if they would have agreed to it. It is in their mission statement/ customer contract,(see below) that they are in business for the best interest of their customers.

        OppenheimerFunds' Principles of Investing are the foundation of our investment approach and our steadfast commitment to these principles is what makes OppenheimerFunds, The Right Way to Invest.

        OppenheimerFunds' Principles of Investing:

        Investment Excellence: Insist on excellent, long-term performance
        Consistency: Over time, those who have the discipline and perseverance to stick to their objectives are rewarded
        Teamwork: Strong and collaborative partnerships are the foundation of enduring success
        Balance: Investment strength comes from having a diversified and flexible approach
        Expertise: Working with a professional puts skill, experience and talent on your side
        Integrity: A principled approach and straight-forward, open communication prevail through all circumstances
        Since 1960, these principles have guided our day-to-day decisions, providing a path to investment achievement through both up and down markets. We recommend them as guidance to all investors.


        So If I had my money with Oppenheimer or another hedgefunds, then yes i would say screw Chrysler. The annointed one (obama) has no business taking sides in this. It's strictly business. Why the hell are we the tax payers dumping money into a company that will be sold to fiat(an italian company). Not that I don't have sympathy for the 30k jobs that are at stake, I am just a business man and a free market thinker, not a socialist like the the idiot running the country. Aren't the Bondholders due back as much money as they can get?
        Last edited by Brighterdays; 05-03-2009, 08:57 PM.

        Comment

        bottom Ad Widget

        Collapse
        Working...
        X