top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Treasury Dept preparing Ch 11 for Chrysler

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Treasury Dept preparing Ch 11 for Chrysler

    U.S. Is Said to Prepare Filing for Chrysler Bankruptcy

    April 23, 2009

    DETROIT — The Treasury Department is preparing a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing for Chrysler that could come as soon as next week, people with direct knowledge of the action said Thursday.

    The Treasury has an agreement in principle with the United Automobile Workers union, whose members’ pensions and retiree health care benefits would be protected as a condition of the bankruptcy filing, said these people, who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case.

    Moreover, Fiat of Italy would complete its alliance with Chrysler while the company is under bankruptcy protection.

    The only major question that remains unresolved is what happens to Chrysler’s lenders, who hold $6.9 billion in company debt. The government’s most recent offer, presented Wednesday, would give the company’s lenders about 22 cents on the dollar, or $1.5 billion, and a 5 percent equity stake in a reorganized Chrysler. Earlier this week, a steering committee of the lenders proposed that they receive 65 cents on the dollar, or $4.5 billion, and a 40 percent equity stake.

    Officials at Chrysler and the Treasury were not immediately available for comment.

    A bankruptcy filing by Chrysler would be the first among Detroit’s troubled automakers, who have been mired in a devastating sales slump since last fall. Treasury is also working with General Motors to prepare a possible bankruptcy case, and the terms of a Chrysler filing might offer a glimpse into the shape of G.M.’s own filing.

    Some analysts questioned whether the Treasury’s steps to prepare a bankruptcy case were an effort to put more pressure on lenders, with which it has exchanged proposals meant to reduce Chrysler’s debt. Chrysler faces an April 30 deadline from the Treasury, while G.M. faces a June 1 deadline in its own efforts to draft a new restructuring plan.

    Under the most likely assumptions, Treasury will provide the financing that Chrysler needs to operate while under bankruptcy protection. The Canadian government is also expected to participate in backing the company.

    The Globe and Mail of Toronto reported the Canadian government’s role on Thursday.

    Last month, the Obama administration told Chrysler it would provide up to $6 billion in financing if Chrysler and Fiat could complete a deal by the end of this month. Fiat originally agreed to take 35 percent of Chrysler, but the stake was subsequently reduced to 20 percent. The administration said it would provide up to $6 billion in financing if the two companies agreed, on top of $4 billion in federal assistance that Chrysler has already received.

    Although the two companies have been holding discussions on an out-of-court agreement, a bankruptcy case would allow Fiat to more easily select the assets of Chrysler that it wants to preserve, such as dealerships, factories and the company’s product development operations, these people said. The approach, which relies upon Section 363 of the federal bankruptcy code, is somewhat similar to what the government is planning in the case of G,M..

    Then, Chrysler could sell or jettison any assets it does not want to keep, and cancel franchise agreements with superfluous car dealers.

    The U.A.W., Chrysler and Treasury have reached agreements in principle that would protect workers’ benefits, these people said, and a similar agreement is expected to be reached as soon as this weekend with the Canadian Auto Workers union.

    Once Chrysler emerges from bankruptcy protection, it would largely be owned by Fiat, the U.A.W., the Treasury and its lenders, these people said.

    Ron Gettelfinger, the U.A.W.’s president, issued a statement on Wednesday saying that the union was “continuing to work toward an agreement that will be in the best interest of Chrysler workers, retirees and the communities where the company does business.”

    People close to the talks said Wednesday that the U.A.W. had tentatively agreed to accept Chrysler stock to finance half of the company’s $10.6 billion obligation to the health care trust. The balance would be paid in cash over the next decade. That money presumably could come from either the Treasury, or from Chrysler’s profits, once it emerges from bankruptcy protection.

    Chrysler has a $9.3 billion pension shortfall, or 34 percent of its total liability, according to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. The agency said earlier this month that it would assume $2 billion of the shortfall in the event Chrysler terminates its pension plans.

    If that happened, retirees would receive sharply lower benefits than they normally would expect. But Chrysler is not obligated to terminate its pension plans while in bankruptcy, particularly if it received federal assistance to fund them.

    It was not clear Thursday where Chrysler would file its bankruptcy case. On Wednesday, Mike Cox, the attorney general of Michigan, urged General Motors and Chrysler to consider filing in the state, rather than Delaware or New York. He said a locally administered case would be more convenient for creditors in Michigan.

    Source: New York Times
    Micheline Maynard reported from Detroit and Michael J. de la Merced from New York. Bill Vlasic contributed reporting.

    Last edited by Flamingo; 04-27-2009, 06:50 PM. Reason: Added date & source to conform to forum posting rules - OP please take note
    Filed CH 7 9/30/2008
    Discharged Jan 5, 2009! Closed Jan 18, 2009

    I am not an attorney. None of my advice is legal advice in any way..

    #2
    I got this gut feeling that more businesses are going to fail.

    Could this have anything to do with gasoline costing over $5.00 a gallon not too long ago?
    Golden Jubilee was a year-long celebration held every 50 years in which all bondmen were freed, mortgaged lands were restored to the original owners, and land was left fallow: Lev. 25:8-17

    Comment


      #3
      Owned by UAW? Thanks but no thanks.

      This looks like more of the same, with less debt. Where the consumer is overpaying for substandard quality and cheap vehicles.

      Unions also need to move into the 21st century. This is 2009, not 1939. Lifetime pensions are ridiculous. They need to get a 401k just like everyone else.

      For me to buy a Chrysler I want the following conditions met:
      • Improved quality - Need to be better than Toyota and Honda (minimum)
      • Improved safety - As per above
      • Improved look and design - Worst looking cars out there.
      • Drastically improved interior - Their interiors are just cheap and nasty.
      • Start designing and manufacturing cars that are actually better than the competition.
      • Improve resale value by working on above points
      Last edited by shabam; 04-25-2009, 11:23 AM.
      My comments are solely based on my opinion. The information and links that I have
      posted are provided solely for informational purposes, and do not constitute legal advice

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by BigJohn View Post
        I got this gut feeling that more businesses are going to fail.

        Could this have anything to do with gasoline costing over $5.00 a gallon not too long ago?
        Yeah...they are going to take all the suppliers down with them!

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by shabam View Post
          Owned by UAW? Thanks but no thanks.

          This looks like more of the same, with less debt. Where the consumer is overpaying for substandard quality and cheap vehicles.

          Unions also need to move into the 21st century. This is 2009, not 1939. Lifetime pensions are ridiculous. They need to get a 401k just like everyone else.

          For me to buy a Chrysler I want the following conditions met:
          • Improved quality - Need to be better than Toyota and Honda (minimum)
          • Improved safety - As per above
          • Improved look and design - Worst looking cars out there.
          • Drastically improved interior - Their interiors are just cheap and nasty.
          • Start designing and manufacturing cars that are actually better than the competition.
          • Improve resale value by working on above points


          We have a 2008 Dodge truck and a 2008 Toyota car. I prefer the Dodge over the Toyota any day. The problem with USA cars is that the auto manufacturers did not forsee $5.00 + gasoline and then the economy collapsing upon itself.
          Golden Jubilee was a year-long celebration held every 50 years in which all bondmen were freed, mortgaged lands were restored to the original owners, and land was left fallow: Lev. 25:8-17

          Comment


            #6
            This doesn't surprise me. The current CEO of the company I work for comes from Chrysler and we just found out that our company will most likely file ch 11 at the end of the year if we don't come up with $35 mil for a loan note.

            This really ticks me off. These CEO's have no experience in the businesses they get paid multi-millions to run. He came from Chrysler and is running the media? They think all business is the same and can be run like the Holiday Inn. They destroy the product, the will of the people who are just doing their jobs, take loans on the company's good credit and then bail with their salary. No one will answer my question on why our profitable business has a $35 million loan note and what it was used for.
            12/05/08 - filed pro se
            01/27/09 - case dismissed and closed - 02/24/09 - case reopened and dismissal vacated
            04/01/09 - new 341 scheduled
            6/02/09 - DISCHARGED!!!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by BigJohn View Post
              We have a 2008 Dodge truck and a 2008 Toyota car. I prefer the Dodge over the Toyota any day. The problem with USA cars is that the auto manufacturers did not forsee $5.00 + gasoline and then the economy collapsing upon itself.
              I know people own dodge and love them but their build quality speaks for itself. They are ranked last in terms of safety, quality and reliability. I like Chrysler and dodge as a brand but just wished they made better cars. They never should have scrapped the intrepid. This could have been a camry and accord competitor. What were the American auto manufacturers thinking? That the rest of the world was stupid for downsizing. Boy has that attitude come back to bite them and us in the ass.

              Sit in a 2009 Camry or accord and then sit in the equivalent dodge and you will see the difference. Even when comparing trucks. Now sit in a Lexus and Accura and they just destroy Chrysler. Dodge have hard ass cheap interiors. All of the other guys have soft, plush and modern interiors. Just look at the 300C. The car has a lot of potential but once you sit in it and drive it, it really lets you down. I would take a V6 Camry or accord over a 300C any day. They quality of the first two speak for themselves. Two of the best selling and most reliable cars.
              My comments are solely based on my opinion. The information and links that I have
              posted are provided solely for informational purposes, and do not constitute legal advice

              Comment


                #8
                My wife has a Toyota car and when I sit in it it reminds me how tuna in a tuna can must feel (that is if I can get in the car). My truck has just barely enought room so when I am lame, I can get into it without any problems.

                I don't think any of the USA car manufacturers use crystal balls so I am not surprised they were taked off guard when gasoline soared to over $5.00 a gallon.

                It is a shame, less and less items say "MADE IN THE US".
                Golden Jubilee was a year-long celebration held every 50 years in which all bondmen were freed, mortgaged lands were restored to the original owners, and land was left fallow: Lev. 25:8-17

                Comment

                bottom Ad Widget

                Collapse
                Working...
                X