Why would cash advances to be in a stable mutual fund be bad? At the very bottom, the chances of losing more were very low, and in fact I made money from those cash advances. (Actually those cash advances would be thought of as simply transferring from one account to another to get a lower interest rate.)
Anyway, I was wondering if insolvency can be thought of as having the ability to pay any debt that does not have other assets on the side. For example if I have $120K in debt, but $70K in assets, my level of insolvency at that time would only be the ability to pay debt on $50K, or about $900/mo. I think anyone can reasonably say that he could get a job paying $900/mo more than living wages. (Actually I had thought I could get a job earning $40/hr, but I couldn't get it.)
Anyway, I was wondering if insolvency can be thought of as having the ability to pay any debt that does not have other assets on the side. For example if I have $120K in debt, but $70K in assets, my level of insolvency at that time would only be the ability to pay debt on $50K, or about $900/mo. I think anyone can reasonably say that he could get a job paying $900/mo more than living wages. (Actually I had thought I could get a job earning $40/hr, but I couldn't get it.)
Comment