We have to go step 2 on the means test....i was doing the one on legalconsumer.com and it says this
Unemployment compensation.
Unemployment compensation. Enter the amount in Column A and, if applicable, Column B.
However, if you contend that unemployment compensation received by you or your spouse was a benefit under the Social Security Act, do not list the amount of such compensation in Column A or B, but instead state the amount in the space below:
Unemployment compensation claimed tobe a benefit under the Social Security Act Debtor:
Spouse:
What's this? (From Congressional Committee Report): "Unemployment compensation is given special treatment. Because the federal government provides funding for state unemployment compensation under the Social Security Act, there may be a dispute about whether unemployment compensation is a "benefit received under the Social Security Act." The forms take no position on the merits of this argument, but give debtors the option of reporting unemployment compensation separately from the CMI calculation. This separate reporting allows parties in interest to determine the materiality of an exclusion of unemployment compensation and to challenge it. " In plain English this means, report it separately. It may not affect the result of the test. If it does, it will be a "material" issue that the debtor may want to assert.)
Soooo, my question is, DO i really have to include it, or can i leave it out? Is there really a yes or no answer to this? We are in CA by the way, if it makes a difference.
Unemployment compensation.
Unemployment compensation. Enter the amount in Column A and, if applicable, Column B.
However, if you contend that unemployment compensation received by you or your spouse was a benefit under the Social Security Act, do not list the amount of such compensation in Column A or B, but instead state the amount in the space below:
Unemployment compensation claimed tobe a benefit under the Social Security Act Debtor:
Spouse:
What's this? (From Congressional Committee Report): "Unemployment compensation is given special treatment. Because the federal government provides funding for state unemployment compensation under the Social Security Act, there may be a dispute about whether unemployment compensation is a "benefit received under the Social Security Act." The forms take no position on the merits of this argument, but give debtors the option of reporting unemployment compensation separately from the CMI calculation. This separate reporting allows parties in interest to determine the materiality of an exclusion of unemployment compensation and to challenge it. " In plain English this means, report it separately. It may not affect the result of the test. If it does, it will be a "material" issue that the debtor may want to assert.)
Soooo, my question is, DO i really have to include it, or can i leave it out? Is there really a yes or no answer to this? We are in CA by the way, if it makes a difference.
Comment