This is a 'What would you do?' question.
Had our chap 7, 341 meeting last week. We own a travel trailer (Non-exempt) that we owe $3k on. We are current on payments and the bank is OK with our 'Retain & Pay' option. Only value I found was on NADA for $4,700.00 asking price on a dealers lot. UST says she may be interested in selling the asset. This is OK with us. I contacted the bank to inform them that the asset may be sold by the UST, and that I would withhold further payments until the issue was resolved. If there was an 'abandament' by the UST, I would send them any past due payments. They were not interested in that. The bank would file a motion, after 60 days, to repo the vehicle if payments were not kept current. The bank rep said that it would be unlikely for the UST to get more than what was owed on the note.
Would anyone continue to make payments under these conditions?
Had our chap 7, 341 meeting last week. We own a travel trailer (Non-exempt) that we owe $3k on. We are current on payments and the bank is OK with our 'Retain & Pay' option. Only value I found was on NADA for $4,700.00 asking price on a dealers lot. UST says she may be interested in selling the asset. This is OK with us. I contacted the bank to inform them that the asset may be sold by the UST, and that I would withhold further payments until the issue was resolved. If there was an 'abandament' by the UST, I would send them any past due payments. They were not interested in that. The bank would file a motion, after 60 days, to repo the vehicle if payments were not kept current. The bank rep said that it would be unlikely for the UST to get more than what was owed on the note.
Would anyone continue to make payments under these conditions?
Comment