It's a long story, and I don't feel like telling it all. lol. I'll try to shorted it as much as possible.
We just moved, and after going to the old place yesterday, that carpet is beyond repair. Obviously it was the cheapest of the cheap (fibers would be sucked out during vacuuming with our tiny, cheap $40 vacuum), and there were a few stains we could never get out when we originally moved in. Well, we added another stain that won't come out (well, I did.. from coloring my hair. Needless to say that was the last time I ever dyed my hair!!!)
Anyways, that carpet is just going to have to be replaced. There's no other way around it. We put probably $150-$200 of our own money trying to fix up that carpet with no luck. Our landlord has the condo on the market and is wanting to sell it, so there is no way stained carpet is going to fly in this market (especially since there are 6 others for sale in the same complex). And, stupid us, never really told her we couldn't get those old stains out.
I expect to have an angry lady contacting me here soon. I did not assume the lease, but I didn't add her to Schedule F since we really don't have charges yet, though I can assume about how much it will be. I can also probably prove the damages happened before we filed (we just filed on Monday. We've been purchasing all kinds of cleaners and crap to clean it up for the past 2 months.)
Or does my "not assuming" the lease suffice? I noticed in Nolo it stated not assuming the lease means I can walk away from all rights and obligations under the lease. Being liable for damages is under the lease.
Question is, should I amend my Schedule F to add her and the estimated charges or are those charges apart of my lease rejection on Schedule G?
We just moved, and after going to the old place yesterday, that carpet is beyond repair. Obviously it was the cheapest of the cheap (fibers would be sucked out during vacuuming with our tiny, cheap $40 vacuum), and there were a few stains we could never get out when we originally moved in. Well, we added another stain that won't come out (well, I did.. from coloring my hair. Needless to say that was the last time I ever dyed my hair!!!)
Anyways, that carpet is just going to have to be replaced. There's no other way around it. We put probably $150-$200 of our own money trying to fix up that carpet with no luck. Our landlord has the condo on the market and is wanting to sell it, so there is no way stained carpet is going to fly in this market (especially since there are 6 others for sale in the same complex). And, stupid us, never really told her we couldn't get those old stains out.
I expect to have an angry lady contacting me here soon. I did not assume the lease, but I didn't add her to Schedule F since we really don't have charges yet, though I can assume about how much it will be. I can also probably prove the damages happened before we filed (we just filed on Monday. We've been purchasing all kinds of cleaners and crap to clean it up for the past 2 months.)
Or does my "not assuming" the lease suffice? I noticed in Nolo it stated not assuming the lease means I can walk away from all rights and obligations under the lease. Being liable for damages is under the lease.
Question is, should I amend my Schedule F to add her and the estimated charges or are those charges apart of my lease rejection on Schedule G?
Comment