I have been asking this question to myself, and wonder if anyone asks it here, and what the answer is:
I was told not to go BK due to the fact that I was poor, jobless, and did not have health insurance. Getting a job with health insurance seemed to be a major reason not to go BK because you never knew if you would have a broken leg or heart attack and the BK meant you had to wait for 7 years before going BK again, so you might end up owing 100,000 for a medical situation when the original amount you owed was 20,000.
So, in 2014, low income people will be allowed to join "pools" or if they are too poor, possibly get expanded Medicare. I am being allowed class 5 Veteran's benefits because I am a low income Veteran, so essentially, the argument about not going bankrupt is a moot point with me.
Does "Obama Care" mean that many more people who have been forced to avoid BK can now go BK?
BK clears the slate, but one thing that I have not heard much is the benefit of allowing people not to artificially keep their incomes small so that creditors do not have the ability to garnish their wages. BK would actually mean "hope" for some of these poor people. They could start making a little more money, and perhaps live better lives, not only because they have insurance, but also because they can make more money, and repair their credit.
Has anyone thought about this?
I was told not to go BK due to the fact that I was poor, jobless, and did not have health insurance. Getting a job with health insurance seemed to be a major reason not to go BK because you never knew if you would have a broken leg or heart attack and the BK meant you had to wait for 7 years before going BK again, so you might end up owing 100,000 for a medical situation when the original amount you owed was 20,000.
So, in 2014, low income people will be allowed to join "pools" or if they are too poor, possibly get expanded Medicare. I am being allowed class 5 Veteran's benefits because I am a low income Veteran, so essentially, the argument about not going bankrupt is a moot point with me.
Does "Obama Care" mean that many more people who have been forced to avoid BK can now go BK?
BK clears the slate, but one thing that I have not heard much is the benefit of allowing people not to artificially keep their incomes small so that creditors do not have the ability to garnish their wages. BK would actually mean "hope" for some of these poor people. They could start making a little more money, and perhaps live better lives, not only because they have insurance, but also because they can make more money, and repair their credit.
Has anyone thought about this?
Comment