Originally posted by NewStart2012
View Post
My personal opinion is that unless the bank whacks the principle, it makes no sense to stay. I have seen the announcement of the new federal guidelines for principle reduction but still know of only a small handful of results. I can show you the math as to why banks would almost always like to get a foreclosure instead of reducing principle, but you can find that all over the internet. I know, I know...seems stupid. But it is true.
Renting isn't as hard as it sounds. Lots of available homes, for less than a mortgage payment. It is easy to search public records for the house you intend to rent and look at the deed to see who bought it when and for how much - that can give you an indication of whether they are about to get foreclosed, or whether your rental payment would cover their mortgage costs, etc. And if you save your mortgage payments, you can present a two or three month deposit rather than the traditional one month deposit. Cash talks loudly to landlords.
Buying again afterwards is difficult but not impossible. Expect to wait 3 years after the last "big event" - a foreclosure, deed in lieu, or BK discharge. Two years after BK discharge you technically become eligible for federally sponsored programs like FHA, but the clock is three years minimum after a foreclosure (or short sale, or deed in lieu). The important word is "eligible" - that is not a guarantee that you would get a loan. Having a sizeable down payment as well as rebuilding your credit after BK means a lot. Some banks are looking at people after 3 years; others will be stubborn and force someone to wait linger. It all depends, but figure 3 years as your initial goal. There are alternatives to a traditional purchase, such as owner-will-carry or investment-type loans (a company will buy the house and then lease it to you under a purchase agreement, giving you x number of years to get your own loan).
Last thing - get it ALL in writing before you sign any offer. And, yes, homes went down that much. We walked away being almost $250k upside down, even though we could afford the payment. It just didn't make sense to pay into a hole when we could save and invest that instead (which we are doing). We had a $570k first and a $80k second on a house worth $400k. We offered the bank $425k to stay. They refused; then we did a short sale for $365k that the bank accepted - and paid us almost $15k to leave intact. Its a crazy world...(someone ought to sell tickets).
Comment