I just came from my second consultation and the attorney seems to think that a 13 would be a better option for me. Of course he's basing this on the fact that I indicated that I want to buy a house and at one point he mentioned that he and his wife have a real estate investment company so he may have been prejudiced.
The thing about a 7 I liked was that it was quick. My case is pretty simple, no house, just credit card debt and I have student loan and car payments left.
The thing about a 13 is that I would be able to buy a house sooner. The downside is it's going to cost me more and I wouldn't have as much to put down because I wouldn't be able to save as much. With the 7 I'd have to wait out that 2 year period.
I'm having difficulty in seeing why I would want to wait 3-5 more years to resolve my debt when I've already been dealing with it for 6 years already. On the other side, it might benefit me with a better credit score and help me buy a house later on. Any thoughts from those more experienced?
The thing about a 7 I liked was that it was quick. My case is pretty simple, no house, just credit card debt and I have student loan and car payments left.
The thing about a 13 is that I would be able to buy a house sooner. The downside is it's going to cost me more and I wouldn't have as much to put down because I wouldn't be able to save as much. With the 7 I'd have to wait out that 2 year period.
I'm having difficulty in seeing why I would want to wait 3-5 more years to resolve my debt when I've already been dealing with it for 6 years already. On the other side, it might benefit me with a better credit score and help me buy a house later on. Any thoughts from those more experienced?
Comment