Does anyone know if you can be hit with a deficiency judgment or federal taxes on the mortgage deficiency if you walk away from a mortgage discharged in CH7 if the foreclosure/sale is completed AFTER the discharge? I've heard yes and no. NJ is a recourse state and deficiency judgments rarely happen from what I've read, but you never know. Basically I'm trying to decide on whether or not I want to do the following:
-Stop paying the (underwater) mortgage along with other debt in February
-File for CH7 in July
-Let foreclosure run its course while living in the home and banking the money-it could be two or three years before we need to vacate because of court log jams
Once the sale is completed, if there's a deficiency between the sale price and the balance owed (which there most certainly will be), two things can happen. First, the IRS can come after the borrower for the "forgiven" debt-not sure if this applies to a non-reaffirmed mortgage post CH7? I'm aware that the Mortgage Debt Relief Act prohibits this for now, but it expires at the end of 2012 and I'm guessing that foreclosure will take much longer than that. Second, the bank has three months after the sale to file a suit to get a deficiency judgment from the borrower. Again, it's exceedingly rare in NJ and the statute of limitations is incredibly short (in other states its years), but still, the possibility exists. The question is, does CH7 negate either of these?
-Stop paying the (underwater) mortgage along with other debt in February
-File for CH7 in July
-Let foreclosure run its course while living in the home and banking the money-it could be two or three years before we need to vacate because of court log jams
Once the sale is completed, if there's a deficiency between the sale price and the balance owed (which there most certainly will be), two things can happen. First, the IRS can come after the borrower for the "forgiven" debt-not sure if this applies to a non-reaffirmed mortgage post CH7? I'm aware that the Mortgage Debt Relief Act prohibits this for now, but it expires at the end of 2012 and I'm guessing that foreclosure will take much longer than that. Second, the bank has three months after the sale to file a suit to get a deficiency judgment from the borrower. Again, it's exceedingly rare in NJ and the statute of limitations is incredibly short (in other states its years), but still, the possibility exists. The question is, does CH7 negate either of these?
Comment