I was thinking about the times that some friends and colleagues of mine had cut up their wives' CC's because they felt that they were spending too much. (I had one friend whose wife would bring home a new article of clothing EVERY WEEKDAY, stopping at the mall on the way home from work!) It seems that had these husbands not done so, there may have been some financial problems that - who knows - may have ended up in a BK as well.
I guess that the question that I am getting at is if folks here feel that had they - or others in BK - not spend so much on non-essential stuff, or let's say, spent more in line of what folks from their income bracket would spend, etc., then BK would not have resulted. Or do you think that shopaholism by and large only affects folks that aren't in danger of BK?
NOTE: I realize that my anecdotes here seem to be sexually slanted, but I've only known one case of a man whose wife had to put HIM on a financial diet (he always liked buying newer and faster bass boats and hunting rifles, etc. - he was NOT a metrosexual. )
I guess that the question that I am getting at is if folks here feel that had they - or others in BK - not spend so much on non-essential stuff, or let's say, spent more in line of what folks from their income bracket would spend, etc., then BK would not have resulted. Or do you think that shopaholism by and large only affects folks that aren't in danger of BK?
NOTE: I realize that my anecdotes here seem to be sexually slanted, but I've only known one case of a man whose wife had to put HIM on a financial diet (he always liked buying newer and faster bass boats and hunting rifles, etc. - he was NOT a metrosexual. )
Comment