Michael Kinsley has a great editorial about how the US government should not default because of the basic idea of ... honor. I wonder, how have you all reconciled your decision to NOT honor your debts with this idea of honor?
As for myself, since I am extraordinarily cynical (especially w/r/t macroscopic entities), the term "honorable" is replaced with the term "legal", and I give it no further thought. With this sort of thinking, the default of the US government is not a matter of honor, but rather, how does this affect the financial situation of the US going forward - i.e., very similar to the calculus I employed in deciding to do my strategic default (I say strategic, because I did have the option of liquidating my 401K and not buying a house on the eve of BK, but chose not to as I had decided that it would not have been a prudent financial move.)
As for myself, since I am extraordinarily cynical (especially w/r/t macroscopic entities), the term "honorable" is replaced with the term "legal", and I give it no further thought. With this sort of thinking, the default of the US government is not a matter of honor, but rather, how does this affect the financial situation of the US going forward - i.e., very similar to the calculus I employed in deciding to do my strategic default (I say strategic, because I did have the option of liquidating my 401K and not buying a house on the eve of BK, but chose not to as I had decided that it would not have been a prudent financial move.)
Comment