Hi Everyone,
I have been reading the forum for several months and some of the advise I've taken has been very helpful, so thanks a bunch!
I filed C7 pro se (in NJ) and so far, things have gone well. Today we received a Discharge of Debtor Notice that said "It appears that the debtor is entitled to a discharge" and "IT IS ORDERED: The debtor is granted a discharge under section 727of title 11 United States Code (The Bankruptcy Code).
Is it ok to feel good about that?
My next hurdle is the Reaffirmation Agreement for my Car Loan. According to the posts on the forum, the Trustee pretty much never allows it. Are there any cases where it is allowed? I've only had my car for a year, I am behind one payment because I am afraid to make the payment if I'm going to lose my car. I can make the payment on the spot if necessary, but how does the court justify denying a person their transportation to get to work so they can earn money so they government doesn't have to support them?
I called the loan company to see what their thoughts on it were but the man I spoke to adamantly let me know he could NOT give me any information that would help me. So now I'm dreading the outcome.
If anyone has any insight on the reaffirmation process, I would be very appreciative if you would share it.
Thanks for being here.
Dory
I have been reading the forum for several months and some of the advise I've taken has been very helpful, so thanks a bunch!
I filed C7 pro se (in NJ) and so far, things have gone well. Today we received a Discharge of Debtor Notice that said "It appears that the debtor is entitled to a discharge" and "IT IS ORDERED: The debtor is granted a discharge under section 727of title 11 United States Code (The Bankruptcy Code).
Is it ok to feel good about that?
My next hurdle is the Reaffirmation Agreement for my Car Loan. According to the posts on the forum, the Trustee pretty much never allows it. Are there any cases where it is allowed? I've only had my car for a year, I am behind one payment because I am afraid to make the payment if I'm going to lose my car. I can make the payment on the spot if necessary, but how does the court justify denying a person their transportation to get to work so they can earn money so they government doesn't have to support them?
I called the loan company to see what their thoughts on it were but the man I spoke to adamantly let me know he could NOT give me any information that would help me. So now I'm dreading the outcome.
If anyone has any insight on the reaffirmation process, I would be very appreciative if you would share it.
Thanks for being here.
Dory
Comment