The BK trustee is looking out for your creditors. If all of your assets are protected by exemptions, they can't be touched by the TT.
As far as expenses, IF your allowed expenses exceed your income and you have negative disposable monthly income, or very little, those issues come into play when determining whether you pass the means test and your schedules I and J. ( expenses and income calculations).
So if the TT thought by selling your livestock, there would be money available not covered by exemptions to pay at least partially some of the debt owed to creditors, they may force the sale of the livestock.
If you used horse/livestock care as an expense on your schedules, the TT would probably not allow it ( at least I am assuming -in regards to the animals not being used as a means of income)
But since most debtors do not use horse care as an allowable expense, and most likely wouldn't even list it anywhere on the schedules, then it most likely doesn't come into play. The TT would have a hard time telling millions of debtors, that having a pet is a hardship. I am sure that there are a lot of debtors out there that pay for pet care, and although having no pets may free up some income ( feed, vet bills, general care) can you imagine the issues if every TT said ("get rid of your pet, you can't afford it". That just isn't what they do. The look for money for creditors. If you have a million dollar racehorse, sure they will want you to sell it, but a trail horse or a hobby horse, not worth the effort on the TT part.
In a CH 13, it may be different, because you are paying back debt over time and the expense may have an effect on your budget, but I have no experience with CH 13.
Basically the TT looks for money/assets to repay creditors with. Determines whether you are within means of filing under certain chapters, and whether you have disposable income to repay your debt.
Hope I 'splained that correctly! Course, as always, I could be wrong.
As far as expenses, IF your allowed expenses exceed your income and you have negative disposable monthly income, or very little, those issues come into play when determining whether you pass the means test and your schedules I and J. ( expenses and income calculations).
So if the TT thought by selling your livestock, there would be money available not covered by exemptions to pay at least partially some of the debt owed to creditors, they may force the sale of the livestock.
If you used horse/livestock care as an expense on your schedules, the TT would probably not allow it ( at least I am assuming -in regards to the animals not being used as a means of income)
But since most debtors do not use horse care as an allowable expense, and most likely wouldn't even list it anywhere on the schedules, then it most likely doesn't come into play. The TT would have a hard time telling millions of debtors, that having a pet is a hardship. I am sure that there are a lot of debtors out there that pay for pet care, and although having no pets may free up some income ( feed, vet bills, general care) can you imagine the issues if every TT said ("get rid of your pet, you can't afford it". That just isn't what they do. The look for money for creditors. If you have a million dollar racehorse, sure they will want you to sell it, but a trail horse or a hobby horse, not worth the effort on the TT part.
In a CH 13, it may be different, because you are paying back debt over time and the expense may have an effect on your budget, but I have no experience with CH 13.
Basically the TT looks for money/assets to repay creditors with. Determines whether you are within means of filing under certain chapters, and whether you have disposable income to repay your debt.
Hope I 'splained that correctly! Course, as always, I could be wrong.
Comment