Originally posted by Flamingo
View Post
As to the rest of your interpretation of what the banks are doing, just because it is in a contract doesn't make it right or legal. if you have access to some legal data bases like Lexis Nexis or Westlaw, you could look up some recent appellate caselaw that addresses these issues. A quick glance shows 4 cases in my district alone last month where Capital One had cases they had brought dismissed because they are charging CRIMINAL usury interest rates. Capital One knows this, they have a team of lawyers that carefully calculate the odds of how many times they can get away with breaking the law vs. getting caught, and clearly the odds favor them in continuing to break the law. It is a numbers game to them, and they will keep doing it as long as we let them, true, but to blindly accept that their written contracts and business practices are acceptable is not going to help the situation. They use tactics to get people to sign which are unethical and carefully thought out by experts who know how to play on peoples emotions and triggers. The average consumer doesn't stand a chance against this, and the banks have to take on their share of the responsibility for their predatory lending practices. It is NOT ALL THE CONSUMERS FAULT. Who is in denial here?
Of course hindsight is 20/20, but telling people they are complaining and blaming when they get here doesn't help. We can all clearly see in hindsight how we got here, but I can't say with any conviction that I saw it coming or would do it differently with the same knowledge and information I had back when I got these cards.
Comment