I am not sure where I come down on the bailout. From a strictly moral point of view, I say let them fail. They made bad decisions, and should be subject to the consequences. But from a practical point of view, that position would likely hurt too many innocent people. Letting the US financial system temporarily crumble is not a good thing.
One problem is most people really don't understand what is going on, and the media is no help. There are two sides of a bank, assets and liabilities. The bail out is focused on the assets, buying the mortgage backed securities etc from which banks generate cash flow. The assets of the bank is what is used to fund liabilities. And guess what a bank's liabilities are, yours and mine deposits sitting in checking, savings, CD's, money markets accounts etc. The cash flow banks generate from their assets is what allows us to withdraw money from our accounts. Strictly speaking, the money you deposit with a bank is a "loan" you make to the bank. A checking account is nothing more than a debt that is owed to you by the bank. Thus, if a bank fails, (or goes bankrupt), if the bank can't pay you, you don't get your money. Granted, for most people, our funds are guaranteed by the FDIC, but still, your checking account is a debt owed to you by the bank...and since this is a BK forum, you all know what happens to debts in BK.
Thus, the bail out is designed to generate capital to allow banks to continue to operate. Should we do the bail out, I don't know. It seems like all the institutions that are going to fail, have done so. My other concern is the emergence of near monopolies in the national banks...after all, who is left standing, JP/Chase, CititGroup, BofA, and Wells Fargo. They are going around buying-up all the failed banks. Granted, there are plenty of local and regional banks.
One problem is most people really don't understand what is going on, and the media is no help. There are two sides of a bank, assets and liabilities. The bail out is focused on the assets, buying the mortgage backed securities etc from which banks generate cash flow. The assets of the bank is what is used to fund liabilities. And guess what a bank's liabilities are, yours and mine deposits sitting in checking, savings, CD's, money markets accounts etc. The cash flow banks generate from their assets is what allows us to withdraw money from our accounts. Strictly speaking, the money you deposit with a bank is a "loan" you make to the bank. A checking account is nothing more than a debt that is owed to you by the bank. Thus, if a bank fails, (or goes bankrupt), if the bank can't pay you, you don't get your money. Granted, for most people, our funds are guaranteed by the FDIC, but still, your checking account is a debt owed to you by the bank...and since this is a BK forum, you all know what happens to debts in BK.
Thus, the bail out is designed to generate capital to allow banks to continue to operate. Should we do the bail out, I don't know. It seems like all the institutions that are going to fail, have done so. My other concern is the emergence of near monopolies in the national banks...after all, who is left standing, JP/Chase, CititGroup, BofA, and Wells Fargo. They are going around buying-up all the failed banks. Granted, there are plenty of local and regional banks.
Comment