Hi. I've been lurking for awhile and find this info very useful. I met with a prominent BK attorney today and I'm very surprised by something that he said.
Very Brief Description of My Situation:
Getting Divorced, Wife and I both made good incomes at some point and over spent dramatically. With the real estate melt down we are in a house that we can't afford and can't sell for what we owe. We have lost $100K in equity. Most of our debt including the 1st mortgage is in my name. Divorce is amicable, and I'm considering personal Bankruptcy as a way to give us both a good start and the ability to care for our twin 3 year olds.
The meeting:
So I met with an attorney today. He asked a lot of questions, and initially I felt pretty good that he was not going to simply dismiss me without considering the facts of my individual case. After the questions he asked what I wanted to do. I told him that I would like to file Chap 7, and I'd gone through the means test and think I might qualify. I also told him that I could not afford my house payment on one salary and that If I couldn't sell I assumed that the bank would take it back. Similar situation for my Yukon where I'm very upside down. This is where it got interesting. He proceeded to say that there is no way I can file 7 because I'm planning to let the house and car go back to the bank and without those expenses I don't qualify. Furthermore it would be fraud to try filing with them included knowing that I'm not going to keep them. We discussed this for quite a while, and after an hour or so he started coming up with some ideas about structuring my divorce settlement so that it would make my income lower or my expenses higher so that it would be easier to qualify. Some of these ideas seemed very marginal to me i.e. buy term life (helps with the means test)and cancel after the bk, but he would not budge on the house and car position.
Am I missing something here?
I realize that BK is not meant for those who can pay their bills, and I wouldn't be considering this if I wasn't getting divorced, but I am, and without 2 incomes I can't pay my bills. I net ~$4000 monthly and my house payment including the 2nd mortgage is nearly $3700. So it just doesn't add up.
Do these statements about the house and car make sense? It seems like BK is the only tool to keep me from getting sued and my wages garnished, because the bank is going to take the house one way or another?
Any suggestions?
Mike
Very Brief Description of My Situation:
Getting Divorced, Wife and I both made good incomes at some point and over spent dramatically. With the real estate melt down we are in a house that we can't afford and can't sell for what we owe. We have lost $100K in equity. Most of our debt including the 1st mortgage is in my name. Divorce is amicable, and I'm considering personal Bankruptcy as a way to give us both a good start and the ability to care for our twin 3 year olds.
The meeting:
So I met with an attorney today. He asked a lot of questions, and initially I felt pretty good that he was not going to simply dismiss me without considering the facts of my individual case. After the questions he asked what I wanted to do. I told him that I would like to file Chap 7, and I'd gone through the means test and think I might qualify. I also told him that I could not afford my house payment on one salary and that If I couldn't sell I assumed that the bank would take it back. Similar situation for my Yukon where I'm very upside down. This is where it got interesting. He proceeded to say that there is no way I can file 7 because I'm planning to let the house and car go back to the bank and without those expenses I don't qualify. Furthermore it would be fraud to try filing with them included knowing that I'm not going to keep them. We discussed this for quite a while, and after an hour or so he started coming up with some ideas about structuring my divorce settlement so that it would make my income lower or my expenses higher so that it would be easier to qualify. Some of these ideas seemed very marginal to me i.e. buy term life (helps with the means test)and cancel after the bk, but he would not budge on the house and car position.
Am I missing something here?
I realize that BK is not meant for those who can pay their bills, and I wouldn't be considering this if I wasn't getting divorced, but I am, and without 2 incomes I can't pay my bills. I net ~$4000 monthly and my house payment including the 2nd mortgage is nearly $3700. So it just doesn't add up.
Do these statements about the house and car make sense? It seems like BK is the only tool to keep me from getting sued and my wages garnished, because the bank is going to take the house one way or another?
Any suggestions?
Mike
Comment