top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Newb!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Newb!!

    Hello all
    This is a great looking forum I am sure I will be here often over the next few months as we embark on this jurney of BK. We go to our second attorney consult on Monday. The first raised all kinds of red flags for us.

    My first question
    My state of NH allows a $4000 exemption for a car. The way I see it this permitts us $4000 equity in a car. So if I have 3 cars 2 that are upside down in a loan and 1 that I own with a book value of $3900. We get to exempt the 1 with a $3900 value and the other two do not count as an asset.

    Is this correct?

    #2
    All three are assets. All three are exempt assets.
    Filed: 10/26/2006
    Discharged: 03/05/2007
    Closed: 5/19/2008 - Asset case due to balance transfer and income tax refund

    Comment


      #3
      the two that are upside down are not assetts becuase you have no equity. Only equity is an assett. They are actually liabilities. You will not have to protect those with exemptions. You will only have to use an exemption on the one that you have equity in. Now where you may come into an issue is that in some states there are stipulations that only 1 vehicles may survive the BK per adult household member, no matter what the status of the exemption is..I'm not sure what state you are in or if that would apply. There may be more to the picture, but in my opinion, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the definition of an assett is something that has equity. And upside down vehichle does not meet that definition and therefore would not need to be protected by an exemption.
      Chapter 7 Pro Se....Discharged Feb. 2006

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by cindylynnsmith View Post
        someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the definition of an assett is something that has equity. And upside down vehichle does not meet that definition and therefore would not need to be protected by an exemption.
        Yep.
        Bankruptcy History:
        Chapter 7 filed - 10/12/2005 - Asset
        Discharged - 02/16/2006
        Case Closed - 11/08/2007

        A banker is a fellow who lends you his umbrella when the sun is shining and wants it back the minute it begins to rain ~ Mark Twain

        All suggestions are based on personal experience and research and SHOULD NOT be construed as legal advice as I am NOT an attorney. Always consult with competent counsel in your area with regards to your particular situation.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by cindylynnsmith View Post
          the two that are upside down are not assetts becuase you have no equity. Only equity is an assett. They are actually liabilities. You will not have to protect those with exemptions. You will only have to use an exemption on the one that you have equity in. Now where you may come into an issue is that in some states there are stipulations that only 1 vehicles may survive the BK per adult household member, no matter what the status of the exemption is..I'm not sure what state you are in or if that would apply. There may be more to the picture, but in my opinion, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the definition of an assett is something that has equity. And upside down vehichle does not meet that definition and therefore would not need to be protected by an exemption.
          But it would need to be listed on SCHEDULE B - PERSONAL PROPERTY.
          Wouldn't it also need to be listed on SCHEDULE C - PROPERTY CLAIMED AS EXEMPT and list the claimed exemption?
          Filed: 10/26/2006
          Discharged: 03/05/2007
          Closed: 5/19/2008 - Asset case due to balance transfer and income tax refund

          Comment

          bottom Ad Widget

          Collapse
          Working...
          X