We received notice today that our trustee has been removed from all cases in which she is serving, and has been replaced by someone else. It gave reference to the specific case, which I have looked up on Pacer.
Seems a specific CH13 case received a 30,000 tort claim. This money was sent to the trustee for disbursement. Standard proceedure is to disburse any moneys received like this to the Unsecured claims first( to keep the debtors from dropping the case after the secured claim is paid off). The debtors lawyer requested a 10,000 refund (for roof repair and vehicle repairs), as well as requesting that the 20,000 be used to pay off the secured claim of the debtor's motgage. The trustee agreed to pay the secured claims first, on the trust that the debtors wouldn't file to dismiss the plan after the secureds were paid. But she forgot to let her staff know, so the money went to the unsecured claims first. Then she "stretched the truth" under oath.
And the debtors never amended schedules I and J, and actually spend most of the $$ on a gambling trip instead of the roof and vehicle. And of course they later filed to dismiss their bankruptcy.
Bottom line, the trustee and the debtors both got in trouble.
If anyone is interested in reading the 32 page opinion, I am willing to send the case #, but I am leery of posting it out in public without one of mods OKing it. Oh, and pacer doesn't charge for opinions, so I think it cost me less than a quarter to find the proper page to look at.
Seems a specific CH13 case received a 30,000 tort claim. This money was sent to the trustee for disbursement. Standard proceedure is to disburse any moneys received like this to the Unsecured claims first( to keep the debtors from dropping the case after the secured claim is paid off). The debtors lawyer requested a 10,000 refund (for roof repair and vehicle repairs), as well as requesting that the 20,000 be used to pay off the secured claim of the debtor's motgage. The trustee agreed to pay the secured claims first, on the trust that the debtors wouldn't file to dismiss the plan after the secureds were paid. But she forgot to let her staff know, so the money went to the unsecured claims first. Then she "stretched the truth" under oath.
And the debtors never amended schedules I and J, and actually spend most of the $$ on a gambling trip instead of the roof and vehicle. And of course they later filed to dismiss their bankruptcy.
Bottom line, the trustee and the debtors both got in trouble.
If anyone is interested in reading the 32 page opinion, I am willing to send the case #, but I am leery of posting it out in public without one of mods OKing it. Oh, and pacer doesn't charge for opinions, so I think it cost me less than a quarter to find the proper page to look at.
Comment