I know someone that is the spouse of a recently deceased that had a CC completely in his name. The deceased also had a brokerage account & IRA with a different financial institution. The spouse said that the CC's legal department said that if he had assets anywhere, she had to pay the debt.
I am wondering if the CC's legal department was accurate, or if they are being in a33hat mode. Certainly, the CC could file a claim at the succession hearing (and it would be in the spouse's best interest to not have the CC involved so as to keep the succession attorney's expensive time minimized), but I am wondering if the CC would have the ability to put a lien on any assets that would be going to beneficiary outside of the succession case, whether that account is IRA or non-IRA. Could it be that all the banks are in collusion so that if someone passes, the CCs simply broadcast to anyone listening that "this guy that just died owes us money", and financial institution that has any assets in his name put a hold on it?
I am wondering if the CC's legal department was accurate, or if they are being in a33hat mode. Certainly, the CC could file a claim at the succession hearing (and it would be in the spouse's best interest to not have the CC involved so as to keep the succession attorney's expensive time minimized), but I am wondering if the CC would have the ability to put a lien on any assets that would be going to beneficiary outside of the succession case, whether that account is IRA or non-IRA. Could it be that all the banks are in collusion so that if someone passes, the CCs simply broadcast to anyone listening that "this guy that just died owes us money", and financial institution that has any assets in his name put a hold on it?
Comment