Originally posted by JusticeForAll
View Post
Has this generation of over the limit fees actually happened to anyone? Chase lowered my limit to an amount slightly, but carefully above my outstanding balance, and I assumed it was to cut me off without generating fees in a way that would make it their fault. I mean, why not just lower the world's limit tomorrow, generating a fee on each account, then raise the limit right after? I suspect there's a limit to what they can do to generate an error on your part and they have plenty of built in and legal ways to do that.
I can at least see a legitimacy to a creditor's lowering your limit or refusing new charges when they want. I can always refuse to lend someone more money when they ask me. The "jack your rates" trick--when it's not an APR correlated to the prime rate--looks more underhanded to me, and I'd love to see a history of the legislation that allows it. They unilaterally start extracting more money out of you once you're committed, but unlikely to be able to pay off in one lump some. Could a car dealer do the same thing by raising your rate after a year of payments while you still owe $15,000 and can't pay the balance to avoid the jacked up rate? Imagine the outrage if they tried it. Or what if I loaned $1000 to my friend on the condition that he pay me back $1100 by next year, then six months later I told him he had to pay me $2000 by year's end instead of $1100 just because I think he's a bigger risk than when I first loaned him the money. I bet he wouldn't pay me the $2000.
The schedule of fees and errors looks to me like the mine field they set for you and then give you a fine print map to: in theory you can avoid it by being good. The jack the rates trick has more of the feel of a blatant rip off, though I assume it's legal to do on unsecured lines of credit.
Comment