My former post was not too clear, hopefully this makes more sense.
Received Notice of Relief from Automatic Stay by attorney for Wells Fargo two days after our 341 hearing. The attorney for Wells Fargo (who resides in Washington State) did not follow Oregon Court's procedures in her request:
1. She did not fill out or attach Oregon's required notice Form LBF#750, she sent us Form 720;
2. The Form 720 does not contain the REQUIRED language which Oregon clearly sets out in their "Procedures for Non-Judicial Relief from Automatic Stay";
3. The Form also has the required notification and service dates incorrect (Oregon states we have 15 days to respond and gives us 5 days before the filing deadline). Her Form states we only have 14 days to respond and 3 days before deadline;
Anyway, even if we challenge based on these discrepancies, what will it change? Won't she just fill out the correct forms and we will still be in the same position?
Thanks again for taking the time to read my babble.
Received Notice of Relief from Automatic Stay by attorney for Wells Fargo two days after our 341 hearing. The attorney for Wells Fargo (who resides in Washington State) did not follow Oregon Court's procedures in her request:
1. She did not fill out or attach Oregon's required notice Form LBF#750, she sent us Form 720;
2. The Form 720 does not contain the REQUIRED language which Oregon clearly sets out in their "Procedures for Non-Judicial Relief from Automatic Stay";
3. The Form also has the required notification and service dates incorrect (Oregon states we have 15 days to respond and gives us 5 days before the filing deadline). Her Form states we only have 14 days to respond and 3 days before deadline;
Anyway, even if we challenge based on these discrepancies, what will it change? Won't she just fill out the correct forms and we will still be in the same position?
Thanks again for taking the time to read my babble.