I am sure that I got through my BK issues due to being obssesively prepared.
Now on to my modification:
As you may know I have both banks disagreeing on thier lein positions and I call them weekly. I am now about 4 weeks away from being out of the BK department.
I spoke to WACH today and I got a very friendly person on the phone. She told me that the loan modification dept might hold it against me that I had not made any payments lately. ( 6 months )
Should I make payments while in a holding pattern with them? It worries me to be so far behind.
I explained that I was using this money to pay off my attorneys and back taxes.
She said they had an interest in keeping me in my home so they would work with me but might require proof of my ability to make payments before approving me.
Was she referring to payments made in a trial modification period? or normal payments while waiting?
She did say that 31% of income was thier guideline for fully amortized payments.
By the way, she told me that they tried to lift the stay in July but apparently the judge did not allow it.
WHAT????????????? Should I not have gotten noticed on this or at least seen it on PACER?
This is the first I have heard of it.
Now on to my modification:
As you may know I have both banks disagreeing on thier lein positions and I call them weekly. I am now about 4 weeks away from being out of the BK department.
I spoke to WACH today and I got a very friendly person on the phone. She told me that the loan modification dept might hold it against me that I had not made any payments lately. ( 6 months )
Should I make payments while in a holding pattern with them? It worries me to be so far behind.
I explained that I was using this money to pay off my attorneys and back taxes.
She said they had an interest in keeping me in my home so they would work with me but might require proof of my ability to make payments before approving me.
Was she referring to payments made in a trial modification period? or normal payments while waiting?
She did say that 31% of income was thier guideline for fully amortized payments.
By the way, she told me that they tried to lift the stay in July but apparently the judge did not allow it.
WHAT????????????? Should I not have gotten noticed on this or at least seen it on PACER?
This is the first I have heard of it.
Comment