Originally posted by tobee43
View Post
Not just because I wrote it, but because it works well.
The shorter they are, the better.
Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, all the consumer has to do is to tell the debt collector in writing that they dispute the validity of the alleged debt. The debt collector must then "VERIFY" the debt, which generally means they will send back a letter that says they hereby "verify" the debt (usually just a small paragraph at most) and sometimes they will also include a page from one of the last billing statements. Other times they send back huge amounts of information. But don't count on it. They don't have to do that at all.
Sometimes you just never hear from them again.
The last part of that #2 letter lets them know in writing that it is inconvenient for you to receive telephone calls from them, which triggers the "inconvenience" clause of the FDCPA which now makes it a violation of federal law for them to continue calling you on the phone.
To quote the FDCPA: Debt collectors shall not call you... "at any unusual time or place or a time or place known or which should be known to be inconvenient to the consumer." By telling them in writing, they are now put on notice that it is inconvenient to call you.
This letter worked great for me.
And from what I hear, the short but sweet ones scare them. They know that you know the law, and they suspect you're going to try to hit them with a FDCPA lawsuit, and so they will sometimes "blacklist" your account for no further activity because your account begins to be seen as a toxic asset that is more trouble than it is worth to try to collect.
Comment