I accidentally opened up a letter that was addressed for someone else to my address (somewhat - it had an apartment at my house, which is ridiculous as my house has always been a detached single unit), and ironically, it was a letter from a collection agency. I have absolutely no idea who this person is - probably a renter from a long time ago before my home went into foreclosure (and then purchased by the person who renovated it and sold it to me.) Reading a collection letter got me thinking that I could sue the collection agency, until I saw the low dollar amount (I never had a defaulted balance this low) and then double checked that it was someone else's name. Or maybe the collection agency was hoping that I would accidentally pay the amount somehow, as I would know that I had defaulted earlier?
Anyway, I suppose that I should ca;; the collection agency and say that I am the owner of the residence at the address and NOT give my name (if they want to, they can check the county clerk for my name ), but I want to make sure they don't clutter up my mailbox again, so I want to be as forceful as possible. What do you think I should do? If I tell them to stop sending me letters, can I sue them if they continue, etc.?
As for the collection letter itself ...
One part says, "Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency". Is this a bald-faced lie? I am thinking that the debtor just has not done anything about the debt, including not filing for BK, and this is a zombie debt buyer - the name is Midland Credit Management Fingerhut, Portfolio Recovery Associates, "We're giving debt collection a good name" (yeah, right!)
(Using round numbers) the amount is $400, and there is an offer to pay it in 1 payment for $80, or $17/mo for 6 months, or "as little as $25/mo", in which the "account will be considered 'Paid in full' once the account reaches a zero balance." It seems that the last option is for worse than even the middle option, so why would it be offered? Methinks that this collection agency is somehow playing a game to be able re-establish the account to try to extend the time limit to sue?
Anyway, I suppose that I should ca;; the collection agency and say that I am the owner of the residence at the address and NOT give my name (if they want to, they can check the county clerk for my name ), but I want to make sure they don't clutter up my mailbox again, so I want to be as forceful as possible. What do you think I should do? If I tell them to stop sending me letters, can I sue them if they continue, etc.?
As for the collection letter itself ...
One part says, "Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency". Is this a bald-faced lie? I am thinking that the debtor just has not done anything about the debt, including not filing for BK, and this is a zombie debt buyer - the name is Midland Credit Management Fingerhut, Portfolio Recovery Associates, "We're giving debt collection a good name" (yeah, right!)
(Using round numbers) the amount is $400, and there is an offer to pay it in 1 payment for $80, or $17/mo for 6 months, or "as little as $25/mo", in which the "account will be considered 'Paid in full' once the account reaches a zero balance." It seems that the last option is for worse than even the middle option, so why would it be offered? Methinks that this collection agency is somehow playing a game to be able re-establish the account to try to extend the time limit to sue?
Comment