top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Admissions, Interrogatories and Production of Documents

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Admissions, Interrogatories and Production of Documents

    Being sued by FIA card services /Bank of America

    CC Agreement states must be settled thru arbitration forum JAMS AAA

    Filed MTC

    Filed response to Plaintiffs MSJ

    Paid Jams fees/Plaintiff sent second notice/has not paid

    Judge has not ruled on MTC. MSJ/MTD - Case on inactive calendar

    Now Plaintiff requests interrogatories etc and in the event of denial of any of the matters herein stated, and subsequent proof thereof by Plaintiff , as per Rule 37(c) AZRCP, requests this court
    order requiring Defendant to pay the reasonable expenses incurred in making said proof, including attorney fees.

    Plaintiff has failed to provide proof that he owns this debt. Yes, I have received the usual affidavit and a CC application and statements for 3 months. Nothing more. This CC originated in 2003-2004.

    Why now do I have to provide the information this JDB has refused to provide to me upon my request from him?

    How would I proceed in answering the interrogatories that I do not want to answer. And personal information about who I was married to and proof there of and divorce proof?

    I do not feel he is entitled to this personal information along with my proof of documentation.

    As my MTC PCA has not been ruled on and this matter cannot be settled in a court of law...why all these requests as though it were going to be settled in court?

    Please advise if this situation is a common one and if why and how I should respond.

    Thanks

bottom Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X