I was confused by DOFD and DOLA for awhile concerning my old charged off debts. The DOFD actually occurred 6 months prior to the date of charge off on all of my debts. For awhile I was going by charge off date, but I actually think the DOFD is what actually starts the SOL clock running.
I personally think the statute of limitations on suing over debts starts with the Date Of First Delinquency, not with the Date Of Last Activity.
For one thing, the creditor or junk debt buyer would have to prove that a payment was made BY ME during that time to legitimately reset the DOLA.
What I have noticed with my own debts is that vast majority of them will cross over the 6 year threshold of SOL on January 1st, 2012. That would be 6 years for most of them since the DOFD.
And I have old credit reports which show the DOFD and DOLA as the same date. This all changed when junk debt buyers purchased the old charged off accounts. The DOFD stayed the same, but suddenly the DOLA changed to the date the accounts were purchased by junk debt buyers. Some even showed a payment on that date, and I know I didn't make a payment on that date. I believe it is the amount that the junk debt buyers paid for the accounts, and let me tell you, they didn't pay much for them!
I kept all the old credit reports showing the old DOLA and the newer DOLA, as well as the letters from junk debt buyers showing when they purchased the accounts, and they show the same month and year as the newer DOLA.
If I was sued, I would certainly take these credit reports in to show the judge proof of what happened.
I went back and looked at all of the DOFDs for my many, many accounts, and it looks like one passed over the SOL threshold over a year ago, and another one slipped by in November. So, as far as I can tell, those are dead debts at this point. I would have to raise the SOL as an affirmative defense, but then I would win the lawsuit.
Most of the rest of them die the SOL death at the end of this month, with just a few dragging their feet into February.
The oldest one is scheduled to drop off my credit report in 2012. Yay!
All of them have remained silent and not made any move against me in the past few years.
I personally think the statute of limitations on suing over debts starts with the Date Of First Delinquency, not with the Date Of Last Activity.
For one thing, the creditor or junk debt buyer would have to prove that a payment was made BY ME during that time to legitimately reset the DOLA.
What I have noticed with my own debts is that vast majority of them will cross over the 6 year threshold of SOL on January 1st, 2012. That would be 6 years for most of them since the DOFD.
And I have old credit reports which show the DOFD and DOLA as the same date. This all changed when junk debt buyers purchased the old charged off accounts. The DOFD stayed the same, but suddenly the DOLA changed to the date the accounts were purchased by junk debt buyers. Some even showed a payment on that date, and I know I didn't make a payment on that date. I believe it is the amount that the junk debt buyers paid for the accounts, and let me tell you, they didn't pay much for them!
I kept all the old credit reports showing the old DOLA and the newer DOLA, as well as the letters from junk debt buyers showing when they purchased the accounts, and they show the same month and year as the newer DOLA.
If I was sued, I would certainly take these credit reports in to show the judge proof of what happened.
I went back and looked at all of the DOFDs for my many, many accounts, and it looks like one passed over the SOL threshold over a year ago, and another one slipped by in November. So, as far as I can tell, those are dead debts at this point. I would have to raise the SOL as an affirmative defense, but then I would win the lawsuit.
Most of the rest of them die the SOL death at the end of this month, with just a few dragging their feet into February.
The oldest one is scheduled to drop off my credit report in 2012. Yay!
All of them have remained silent and not made any move against me in the past few years.
Comment