DYLAN150, the issue is not whether or not a creditor could successfully get anything by placing a lien on your house. The issue is that most collection law firms and JDB's use a computer model to predict the ability to recoup funds from a person and base their decision to sue on that. The mere fact that real estate titled in your name exists--regardless of whether or not there is any equity at this moment--is one of the major factors that goes into the "sue or don't sue" decision. Even though your house may be $50,000 underwater now that doesn't mean that there will never be any equity, and a judgement lien doesn't go away, and must be paid in order to get clear title when you want to sell or refinance.
Besides, the mere act of being sued is likely to cause a lot of stress for you, which may lead to health problems, etc. I know that when I was sued it was one of the most stressful experiences, and that was not a creditor lawsuit--it was a customer of my former employer bringing suit because of work that the company did and I took part in. Even though I was in fact unemployed at the time, and so poor I was getting public assistance, the situation of being sued was very stressful, and since I have Crohn's Disease, I got very sick from the stress. And if the lawsuit had resulted in a judgement against me, I would have filed for bankruptcy.
Besides, the mere act of being sued is likely to cause a lot of stress for you, which may lead to health problems, etc. I know that when I was sued it was one of the most stressful experiences, and that was not a creditor lawsuit--it was a customer of my former employer bringing suit because of work that the company did and I took part in. Even though I was in fact unemployed at the time, and so poor I was getting public assistance, the situation of being sued was very stressful, and since I have Crohn's Disease, I got very sick from the stress. And if the lawsuit had resulted in a judgement against me, I would have filed for bankruptcy.
Comment