Somewhere, I was reading something, that seemed to at least imply that as your unpaid debt 'ages' at about the 2 year point, it starts to not pull your score down as much as when the default first started?
If true, and I understand it may not be, would 2+ year old defaulted debt and a FC, look better or worse, than a BK and a FC? ...
Of course, I know ALL variations of these scenarios are bad, but I'm only curious about what might be the 'best of the worse' here?
If this should be posted in 'Credit Recovery' subforum, I apologize, wasn't sure.
If true, and I understand it may not be, would 2+ year old defaulted debt and a FC, look better or worse, than a BK and a FC? ...
Of course, I know ALL variations of these scenarios are bad, but I'm only curious about what might be the 'best of the worse' here?
If this should be posted in 'Credit Recovery' subforum, I apologize, wasn't sure.
Comment