You are you viewing the Bankruptcy Forum as a guest (limited viewing).
Don't have a BKForum account yet?
Please REGISTER (it's FREE & takes 30 seconds) so you can post your own questions and see all the features available to registered users.
No one is truly judgment proof. Anyone can sue and get a judgment. The proper terminology is "collection proof." If you are CP, anyone can get a judgment and it won't mean squat.
Paper checks eliminate large balances in bank accounts. There are states out there where garnishment of wages is illegal (TX, PA, NC, SC). However once it is deposited in a bank, it is fair game because once you are paid they are no longer "wages". These people are told to stop using direct deposit. Paper checks prevent this...unless you deposit them yourself. It is a safety measure to keep people from raiding your bank account.
As for garnishment, paper checks do not stop garnishment. Garnishment usually winds up happening through your employer so you don't even see the money.
First consult: You go now, no CH 7 for you. You spent entire buffet. 13 has a 95 percent payback. (Owwwch) On to next consult....
However, apparently there was a court case in TX where the payroll company operated out of another state and the collectors managed to successfully circumvent it.
But yes, TX is far and away the most debtor friendly state in the US. The state version of FDCPA applies to the OCs too. Made BoA stop calling me that way. Now I just get monthly statements and changes to the agreements since their toy (NAF) was taken away. They tried one CA but I hired an attorney when they violated several state and FDCPA rules.
First consult: You go now, no CH 7 for you. You spent entire buffet. 13 has a 95 percent payback. (Owwwch) On to next consult....
Comment