top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fears about Writ of Execution

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by GoingDown View Post
    This is my point exactly.

    In theory, it could happen, but...

    Why have we never or at least very rarely ever heard of it happening?

    #1. It is simply not profitable for the credit card company to sift through mountains of low value items in order to get paid. They are not set up to do this, and it would end up costing them more than it was worth to them. They want only wages, checking accounts, and liens on real estate (and very rarely liens on cars with a lot of equity). Everything else is usually a waste of their time.

    #2. The sheriff has serious criminals who pose a major threat to society to go after every day of the year. If his deputies and constables are busy sifting through the smelly contents of my underwear drawer looking for a jewel, while people are getting killed on the streets of Phoenix, then he probably won't get re-elected.


    The only times I've ever heard of anything even remotely similar happening is when it is a civil judgment for divorce, child support, and sometimes wrongful death, where the judgment creditor doesn't care about making a profit, they just want revenge, and they are willing to pursue the debtor to the ends of the earth to get back at them. But credit card companies and junk debt buyers want to make a profit, so they go low hanging fruit... checking accounts, wages, and real estate. They don't do things for spite.
    Were it me, I'd make a point to make it a PR nightmare for the police dept. and the judgment-creditor. A nice big deal about your tax-dollars being used to bully people for the big credit card companies or some such. How drug dealers are selling to our kids, but Capital One (for example) has the cops going through my house looking for something that doesn't exist.

    Comment


      #17
      Actually, after having gone back over many threads in these fine forums, I think I've only actually found one instance of a writ trying to get at someone's personal property, and in the end the creditor stopped the writ after the individual went to the judge with his exemptions. And even in that case, they were most interested in a car he owned. I'm now wondering, has anyone hear ever heard of a debtor actually having their personal belongings (as in household items) hauled off?

      In my situation, I have no car, wages, or bank accounts. I certainly don't have a $5000 painting on the wall or a collection of rare coins, and now I'm starting to see as other have pointed out that a creditor isn't going to try to recoup their losses on my 5 year old computer (which was by no means state of the art when new) and 8 year old Playstation 2.

      But I guess when you have very little you become afraid of losing it.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by desperatio View Post
        Actually, after having gone back over many threads in these fine forums, I think I've only actually found one instance of a writ trying to get at someone's personal property, and in the end the creditor stopped the writ after the individual went to the judge with his exemptions. And even in that case, they were most interested in a car he owned. I'm now wondering, has anyone hear ever heard of a debtor actually having their personal belongings (as in household items) hauled off?

        In my situation, I have no car, wages, or bank accounts. I certainly don't have a $5000 painting on the wall or a collection of rare coins, and now I'm starting to see as other have pointed out that a creditor isn't going to try to recoup their losses on my 5 year old computer (which was by no means state of the art when new) and 8 year old Playstation 2.

        But I guess when you have very little you become afraid of losing it.
        The only times I have heard of it happening is when it is a matter of revenge from the angry ex-spouse in a divorce case or from the angry family of someone killed by manslaughter (wrongful death). Those are very rare instances. I have never heard of a consumer credit card debt rising to this level of revenge and spite. It would be a bad business decision for them. They want to make money, not lose money.

        Now, on the other hand, if you get on the phone with a debt collector and tell them you own a painting or a coin collection worth a lot of money, that might come back to haunt you. The only way they would know about it is if you told them about it. Or if you were foolish enough to brag about your assets on Facebook or something like that.
        The world's simplest C & D Letter:
        "I demand that you cease and desist from any communication with me."
        Notice that I never actually mention or acknowledge the debt in my letter.

        Comment


          #19
          True. If they're coming after personal property, they either know or think you're hiding something with some value to it. Which means, either you are hiding assests and you've got bigger problems than your dirty underwear; or there's nothing to find, they'll waste their time, their money, and piss off the local cops when they don't find anything and put the cops of mind not to be to inclined to help out the creditors anymore on stuff like this.

          Comment


            #20
            Well I had a secured interest personal loan with American General for $5K. It was secured by 3 computer I owned. How they got that value I have no idea? Anyway I defaulted, lack of income and a 28% interest rate to boot. SO they got a judgment about 7 month after the default. Almost 1 year later the local sheriff comes knocking and loud with a writ to levy my personal property. I was not at home at the time. I called and they said they have a writ to photograph all my property in my home and auction it off at sheriff sale in the tune of $7K. If I did not comply by allowing them access to my home, they would go back to the judge and have a bench warrant issued for contempt and my bail would be equal to the judgment amount.

            In the end I settled 2 days later with AG for $5K cashiers check.

            Comment


              #21
              'LoadedGuns':

              Yes, that is interesting !
              However your default was, as you stated, on 'secured' assets, vs. credit card defaults which generally have the 'unsecured' status.

              Would love to find out where which state you are located...?

              Comment


                #22
                Wow, so they were going to take everything, not just the computers used to secure the loan? Of course, like OHBOY noted, I wonder how being a secured loan might have made this different from unsecured credit cards.

                Comment


                  #23
                  I have a final judgement and a writ of execution entered against me and a debtor's exam this past April and have yet to have them take any action,

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by OHBOY View Post
                    'LoadedGuns':

                    Yes, that is interesting !
                    However your default was, as you stated, on 'secured' assets, vs. credit card defaults which generally have the 'unsecured' status.

                    Would love to find out where which state you are located...?
                    Delaware.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by desperatio View Post
                      Wow, so they were going to take everything, not just the computers used to secure the loan? Of course, like OHBOY noted, I wonder how being a secured loan might have made this different from unsecured credit cards.
                      Yes they would photograph everything and auction it, and whatever items sold, they would come collect.

                      Like I said in my original post. It was secured. I've defaulted on 6 other unsecured loans around the same time and only Crap 1 shows any interest to pursue a judgment.

                      Also, on a side note. American General was a local retail store location. I applied on line, and signed my life away only 5 miles from my front door. They knew I was a homeowner. I guess they had no interest in a lien on the house?

                      Comment


                        #26
                        My experience with American General was a lawsuit. They had a branch located in a nearby town. When I defaulted several years ago, they immediately went to small claims court. They did this themselves and did not hire any legal firm. Pretty simple to file small claims in Oregon and AG knows this. I encouraged them to proceed with wage garnishment, which they did. The ~ 1500 judgment was paid off in a couple of months.

                        Citifin had a local branch office until a year ago. I haven't seen much suit action out of them in the local courts. I think it is interesting to note that in my area citifin wrote loans up to the small claims amount. With the loss of the branch office, they are out of the small claims suits. An attorney cannot represent either party in small claims in my state. I'm sure when they had the local branch they had folks trained in small claims.


                        C1 and Citi (credit cards) also have judgments against me. C1 is the most recent. After 6 months citi has still not filed a writ of garnishment. I called C1 and told them to get moving, but they still have done nothing. As of a few weeks ago, the department of education (student loans) has a permanent garnishment order for 15%. I don't know if it is worth C1 or chiti's time to try for the other 10%, as the writs for these folks would only be good for 90 days at a time.

                        I also have a past-due amount of taxes owed. I have encouraged the local state revenue office to use their 25% garnishment powers. They don't seem very interested. In terms of filing all past taxes, I am current. I just owe for back taxes. I can agree to a wage assignment, however, this does not count toward my 75% wage garnishment exemption. If they will file a garnishment with my employer, i think they move to the front of the garnishment line. That would be great if they would do this as this debt would be paid off in a few months. I'm sitting on the sidelines waiting to see what the state wants to do.

                        What I am trying to point out is that i am not exactly a ripe fruit for an unsecured private judgment creditor. They have to get in line behind the government garnishments for whatever "seconds" are available.

                        I believe that the most likely occurence in the future will be for the judgment creditors to sell or assign the judgments for collections.

                        Bottom line is if you can afford 25% of takehome pay to go toward judgment creditors, this can be beneficial. I can't get out of the student loans or back taxes, so encouraging these folks to get in the front of the garnishment line is quite beneficial to me.

                        A BK 13 would settle all of my debt issues, but to each his/her own.

                        Keep in mind much of the above is speculation on my part, since I can't read the minds of my creditors.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by treehugger1 View Post
                          My experience with American General was a lawsuit. They had a branch located in a nearby town. When I defaulted several years ago, they immediately went to small claims court. They did this themselves and did not hire any legal firm. Pretty simple to file small claims in Oregon and AG knows this. I encouraged them to proceed with wage garnishment, which they did. The ~ 1500 judgment was paid off in a couple of months.

                          Citifin had a local branch office until a year ago. I haven't seen much suit action out of them in the local courts. I think it is interesting to note that in my area citifin wrote loans up to the small claims amount. With the loss of the branch office, they are out of the small claims suits. An attorney cannot represent either party in small claims in my state. I'm sure when they had the local branch they had folks trained in small claims.


                          C1 and Citi (credit cards) also have judgments against me. C1 is the most recent. After 6 months citi has still not filed a writ of garnishment. I called C1 and told them to get moving, but they still have done nothing. As of a few weeks ago, the department of education (student loans) has a permanent garnishment order for 15%. I don't know if it is worth C1 or chiti's time to try for the other 10%, as the writs for these folks would only be good for 90 days at a time.

                          I also have a past-due amount of taxes owed. I have encouraged the local state revenue office to use their 25% garnishment powers. They don't seem very interested. In terms of filing all past taxes, I am current. I just owe for back taxes. I can agree to a wage assignment, however, this does not count toward my 75% wage garnishment exemption. If they will file a garnishment with my employer, i think they move to the front of the garnishment line. That would be great if they would do this as this debt would be paid off in a few months. I'm sitting on the sidelines waiting to see what the state wants to do.

                          What I am trying to point out is that i am not exactly a ripe fruit for an unsecured private judgment creditor. They have to get in line behind the government garnishments for whatever "seconds" are available.

                          I believe that the most likely occurence in the future will be for the judgment creditors to sell or assign the judgments for collections.

                          Bottom line is if you can afford 25% of takehome pay to go toward judgment creditors, this can be beneficial. I can't get out of the student loans or back taxes, so encouraging these folks to get in the front of the garnishment line is quite beneficial to me.

                          A BK 13 would settle all of my debt issues, but to each his/her own.

                          Keep in mind much of the above is speculation on my part, since I can't read the minds of my creditors.
                          Interesting that you brought that up: one of the first attorneys we spoke with suggested the same thing (I guess it's the same). Let one bill get a garnishment for the whole allowable amount, then let the rest shuffle up and get in line to wait their turn, stop paying anything unsecured, and ride it out till we qualify for a Chapter 7. File chapter 7, and strip the garnishment then. It'd be about 6 to 9 months (give or take) of tight[er] living, but in the end it would only serve to benefit us. It's the same effect as a Ch. 13 so why pay trustee and legal fees and get locked into a screw job of a repayment plan when this gives us the option of going for the nuke when we're able to.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            I'm going to threadjack this conversation because a County Sheriff visited me last week with a Writ of Execution to levy my property for a sheriff sale and some posters think it never happens.

                            A few years ago I consolidated most of my student loans. One loan slipped through the cracks and apparently wasn't consolidated. The loan also disappeared from my online records kept by the government for almost a year. This was a private student loan offered by the school and not one of the better-regulated federal loans. I presumed it was consolidated, and thought I had proof of such, until I was served with the notification of the court hearing (in a town 65 miles away). I suspect the notification was improperly served, but that is now irrelevant because the default judgment was apparently rendered over a year ago.

                            Here's the thing: I am collection-proof. I own no home and no car. I am unemployed. I have no money in my bank account (they found an old one that had $3 in it!). Most of my personal property was "disposed of" (as in "thrown out") when I was forced to move into my parents' home in lieu of becoming homeless (which I guess I am anyway).

                            Surprise, surprise, the sheriff arrived the other day. I wasn't home so he told my dad to tell me to call him. Among other things he told my elderly father was that he might return and force entry in order to levy property for the judgment. My father asked and was told that there was no warrant for my arrest and the sheriff never mentioned any other means to access the home or serve me with papers. The sheriff held papers in his hand, my father said he asked if they were for me, and the sheriff would not give them to me father (who was meant to be a reliable word-of-mouth liaison?).

                            I called the sheriff a few hours later. The phone call went badly -- the sheriff wouldn't tell me what he wanted, the call kept dropping, he kept mentioning how I didn't understand the law when I asked direct questions about what he wanted, etc. At one point, I had to call the sheriff back because the line went dead. When the line went out again, I told him I needed to end the call. I then called the office of the school's attorney to find out what was going on. After a 15-minute fruitless and frustrating phonecall with them that revealed that the guy I spoke to had no clue why a sheriff was visiting me, I saw the sheriff's cruiser outside and ended that call as well.

                            Apparently the sheriffs (there were 2 now!) were offended by my abrupt end to the call and rushed right over to levy property. They would not identify themselves. They told me I had created this situation with my behavior on the phone. And then they all-but-accused me of illegal wiretapping because I had a cell phone in my hand (that I had already willingly turned off in front of them without them having to ask). They fully knew the house and its property inside was not mine, but all-but-admitted they were going to levy my father's property to punish me. I eventually convinced them I wasn't trying to be non-compliant when I offered to allow them access to the bedroom I sleep in to see what I own in the house.

                            Up in the bedroom, I pointed out items that were mine, and they wrote them down. They kept telling me how it was all my fault they were there. At one point I talked back to them and was told they were not going to be friendly any more, so they started listing property that I had told them belonged to my parents. As apparently usual, they refused to list the many books I had in the room, nor any of the DVDs in open view, and even listed the condition as "good" on items I told them were broken. As they left, I was again lectured that I had caused all of this. As I was being handed the very papers I asked for when they arrived and wanted clarification about their having in their possession on the phone:

                            A Writ of Execution with a clause in capital letters that provides means for my parents to claim their property as exempt from levy for my debt.

                            The sheriff had refused to show me the document. He ignored my questions about the document. And now I have items up for auction at a sheriff's sale. Once my parents' stuff is removed (at a cost of $30!), anyone can bid on some broken electronics and an 8-year-old computer with a malfunctioning monitor and speakers. And that's only if I don't claim them as exemptions.

                            Main point: Some creditors will do anything to punish debtors and attempt to recoup their losses by seizing personal property. Even on a very small amount of money they have ballooned to double the original amount.

                            So, protect yourself. Try to pay the debt if you can. Always be bootlickingly polite to sheriffs. And, finally, tell everyone you know to STAY AWAY FROM PRIVATE STUDENT LOANS!

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Lesson learned. Secured personal loans are the tools of the devil.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                fool4school: and where are you located ?

                                Comment

                                bottom Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X