ok...now i am a little confused by my last post here.....Texas does NOT garnish wages....so if someone uses direct deposit of wages on a netspend acct...which is in TEXAS..and governed by Texas law...should NOT be garnished..right???...and they ADMIT..they are NOT a bank...so if someone in another state uses netspend for direct deposit..they SHOULD be safe..just by the FACT they are located in TEXAS.....from the way i am reading it....the case law quoted below...shows the REVERSE effect of domesticating a judgment but doesnt seem to apply to someone out of state....any help here clearing that up???
44. Texas Wage Garnishment
Wages cannot be attached or garnished, except for child support.
Income that is not a wage can be garnished or ordered turned over to a receiver.
Bank accounts, rents and royalties can be garnished.
Exemptions include social security benefits.
WARNING For individuals living in Texas who are paid from an out of state location, there is case law (Baumgardner vs. Sou Pacific 177 S.W. 2d 317) to support taking a judgment from Texas, domesticating the judgment in the foreign state, then filing the wage garnishment there. Many creditors have used this strategy successfully
44. Texas Wage Garnishment
Wages cannot be attached or garnished, except for child support.
Income that is not a wage can be garnished or ordered turned over to a receiver.
Bank accounts, rents and royalties can be garnished.
Exemptions include social security benefits.
WARNING For individuals living in Texas who are paid from an out of state location, there is case law (Baumgardner vs. Sou Pacific 177 S.W. 2d 317) to support taking a judgment from Texas, domesticating the judgment in the foreign state, then filing the wage garnishment there. Many creditors have used this strategy successfully
Comment