I think I just made a collector cry....

[BigJohn]

Do you think for a minute anyone believes your BS? First off, the house would still be sealed. Second there would be no tear gas canisters left laying around, no boxes of ammo etc they are all recurved once the investigation is complete. Third, before you would be allowed to enter it would have been "scrubbed", the investigation complete, the chair he was in would be bagged and removed. Fourth, you don't get a search warrant after an officer involved shooting it is not required. You want me to keep going or do you now get the point.

You just can't stop making this stuff up. Plus your so bad at it, it is blatantly obvious to most normal people not to mention to myself who after 20+ years a fire chief has seen more "real" crime scenes than you will have watched on TV. I don't care if your in the back woods of the Ozarks your not getting in that house only three days (two days really) after an a SWAT team just fatally wounded someone at that house. Their own scene investigators are still logging, bagging and photographing evidence. Plus is may remained sealed for months not just two and half days.

So no John what you just stated you did is not what happened, and no there is no search warrant for "wooden" dowels, no chunks of flesh stuck to the screen, and no John, you didn't get to go play CSI over at that house.

You lied about the first attempt to tell the story do you really feel the need to continue? Or are we going to do the same crap as you did about the car last time?

You don't even get the fact that the people reading this thread are rolling their eyes at what you type do you?

And John is off on another its a big police cover up and somehow you are always part of it.

It amazes me how you get emotional over my post. This reminds me of the thread I stared last year in regards to the car we purchased. If you remember, you competely derailed that thread.



So what is it BigBoy2U, first you said the event didn't happen, now you claim what I wrote is all wrong. So are you now saying the event did occur?

Are you saying what I said was wrong but what the news media said was 100% right?


So how many crime scenes have you REALLY saw that involved a SWAT team or SWAT teams?


Do you claim all jurisdictions operate the same as the juridiction you live in does?

[BigJohn]

John has said before how the local cops where he lives have pulled him over and arrested him and took him into the police station over the whole stolen car problem (the car dealer filed a stolen vehicle report on him when the bank didn't pay for the car), so I can tell the cops where he lives are not very understanding.

None of those event never happened. You just made them up so as to flame me one more time. You have twisted those events of last year just like you did when I orignally posted them.





If you remember, you went after me with a passion last year over that thread. Your behavior derailed the thread and if you remember, I removed all of my posting relating to that thread.

[BigJohn]

Gee, now how did we get the part about the man sitting outside in a chair facing the house? I am all confused now.

You are the expert, so tell me? Whatever I say you will deny.

[catleg]

This whole story doesn't make any sense from either side.
Must be August in the desert has something to do with it.
Since when do cops bust in on a guy who's still talking?
Whole thing very sad, makes cops look bad, where is mental health services, probably had budget cuts.
All I know is reading that story is not the entire story.

[BigJohn]

This whole story doesn't make any sense from either side.
Must be August in the desert has something to do with it.
Since when do cops bust in on a guy who's still talking?
Whole thing very sad, makes cops look bad, where is mental health services, probably had budget cuts.
All I know is reading that story is not the entire story.

BigBoy2U can not answer my simple question on the matter: "Is the account I was relating the same account others have posted about?"



I am disgusted with how this thread got derailed.

When posters have issues with others, they should handle it via private messages instead of using the forum as a tool for flaming.

[BigJohn]

Sure John you make posts that are fictitious, I challenge you and you blame me and delete your posts then blame me for "derailing" it.

Hmmm....do you see a pattern here? I am not the one making things up!

You went along and deleted all your posts in that thread several months later. I corrected what you had posted since again it was outlandish events and incorrect information about vehicle titles and repossessions.

But here is a copy of what you said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohn
UPDATE

Went back and spoke to the detective from the Inspector General's Office. He told me when he showed the general manager of the dealership the paper he filled out stating the odometer reading of the car when he retitled the car, the general manager almost filled his pants. The detective told him it was a felony to fill the document out without knowing the real odometer reading. Then he showed him our title to the car which showed no liens. That almost made the general manager almost pass out. The detective said if the dealer doesn't get this resolved within a week, he will retitle the car as the owners and the dealer as the lienholder and then the dealer and I can go to court to see if a contract can be worked out.

The Detective also got after the dealer for trying to repo the car. They tried repossessing the car again this week. The Detective also got after the dealership for reporting the car stolen. The detective called the local police station and told them that the car is not stolen and we can not be arrested for this. He also told the dealer that if me and/or my wife did get arrested, he (the dealer) would have been in a whole lot of trouble.
The dealership now claims the bank, for some unknown reason, electronically debited the dealer's bank account for the amount of the loan. So what I wrote to the dealer's lawyer was a proposal:
The problem the dealer has is with the bank, not us. We did not take the money from their account. The dealer should be dealing with the bank, not us and if the bank feels we have an unjust enrichment, then the bank should go after us, not the dealer.

For some unknown reason (?), the bank called us twice almost begging us to come in and sign a loan paper at their office as opposed to the dealership.

Link to post:

So BigBoy2U, are you saying if a person makes a false odometer statement, it is not a crime? Are you saying such events never happen? Are you saying if such an event happened, it is oultandished to believe?




You claim everything I said was outlandish but if you noticed, you never were able to prove anything I said to be a lie.


You tried your best back then to get others to flame me just like you were.

[BigJohn]

As I just posited above the events I stated did happen. What I can't locate since you removed the post was the one where the police pulled you over in the car and then (my mistake you were not arrested) you were escorted by the police to the station.

So yes I admit to getting the arrested part wrong, but clearly the rest of what I said was true since I was able to locate your own post, it shows what I said.

It would seem to me you would have been able to "correct" me about what I said and not just deny the whole thing or was that fabricated also?

I mean how can anyone believe what you say when you post stuff like this:



Whew, alrighty... I hear that Twilight Zone music playing again....

So is it really "flaming" you or whatever when all I do is post what you said about yourself or say I don't agree with what your saying.

I came out and said I think you embellish what you post and I provide links to prove what I have said. There is no flaming no other crap. That is pretty simple and straightforward. You can twist it into a figure 8 but it won't change it.

I suppose you want me to post the place where I worked that required a top secret government security clearance? You do know they exist, don't you?

Then you will want to know exactly what project or projects I worked on.

Obviously you are not familiar with government security clearances.

There was no reason to flame me when I first made that post and there is really no reason for you to bring this up again unless it is to flame me again and to try to incite others into flaming me.






As for the other post you refer to in which you said I got arrested, As I have already said, that posting of yours was pure fabrication. As far as I can see with that posting is that all you were doing was trying to get others excited so to flame me.

[BigJohn]

Now that this thread has been totally derailed, is it possible to post on the topic instead of post on the presumed character flaws that you see in certain posters?

[Flamingo]

This thread is being closed as it has run its course and is totally off topic and hijacked.