top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is This A Scam Edited Perspective:

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Is This A Scam Edited Perspective:

    The issue concerns a company in which gave my friend a loan and somehow took it upon itself to use his second home as collateral. The friend stated that he never even gave them that information on the second home, in addition, he doesn't know how they got any information anyway.
    The company filed suit saying that he defaulted on payments and he had not, and had payed off half the loan in the loans first quarter. However, the company also filed various subsequent frivolous charges.
    My friend states that one reason the company is fabricating the collateral ordeal is because the second home was in litigation over issues regarding the title, and at the time the loan was applied for, the clerk in the county had possession of the title and he could not occupy the property in question nor convey it.
    When litigation was over, the company in which filed suit wanted to collect on behalf the county the fees for the sheriff delivering the title, also on some delinquent taxes.
    My Friend states that: "they have no standing to attempt to file on behalf the county, and especially on issues that have been worked out with the relevant agencies. He in turn wants to sue for damages and have sanctions placed on them from further filing suit against him.
    The friend further stated he is aware of some issues of the company taking borrowers collateral such as unoccupied second homes, and renting them out behind the borrowers back, therefore getting paid double, by making money of the interest and also by the rent they charged for the occupation of the home.
    Does anyone out there think that this is a scam this loan company is running because I don't think it's fair to do these things to who just wanna live a somewhat comfortable life stress free as much as possible. Tell me what you think about this please.

    #2
    Why didn't the "friend" simply defend against the initial lawsuit. No offense, this friend's story sounds like BS to me, and either you don't know the full story or your are not telling the full story.

    Comment


      #3
      you did a good job editing

      I agree with HHM that your friend is not telling the whole story. @t just doesn't sound right.
      Chapter 7 Pro Se....Discharged Feb. 2006

      Comment


        #4
        The best advice you can give your friend is to go see a competent attorney to look over the situation.
        May 31st, 2007: Petition Filed by my lawyer
        July 2nd, 2007: 341 Meeting Held
        September 4th, 2007: Discharged and Closed.

        Comment


          #5
          To HHM:
          thanks for your reply. See, the action has not been disposed o f and the other charges are amendments. The point is, the lender should not have been able to file charges in attempt to collect on behalf of the county, in which I'm sure the court will rule lack of standing for there are no third party standing in such issues. He has filed for a motion to dismiss. The initial charge will be dismissed hopefully because he has documents to prove solvency. The problem is the fact that this lender keeps filing actions against him in which constitutes vexation. Remember the statement about lender renting out second houses in which clients have gotten loans on that are unoccupied, well, I believe it, because it happens in my state in which I live, when the lender is making double off rent and interest on the loan. I believe sanctions are warranted, he faxed the documents and receipts for me to go over them. I believe he has gotten caught up in some mess that will take time to straighten out.

          Comment


            #6
            Where is this taking place?

            Comment

            bottom Ad Widget

            Collapse
            Working...
            X