I have an issue that I feel is hard to explain, but I will try my best because I need some insight on the situation. I was contacted last year by an attorney representing a company that owned numerous acres of land saying that while they were conducting a tile search my name, plus others family members names were attached to the deed and that it was an error and that we needed to clear it up (or else). It is an error, a big one for sure, but I'm willing to clear it up and they are willing to pay me $690ish to do so.
I told my bankruptcy attorney before filing in an email, during, and gave him the attorneys letter (the one saying do it or they will sue), the lease that expires in September (for mineral rights), and so on. Was that suppose to be listed in our bankruptcy as an asset? I own mineral rights below the surface, but I do not own the property. I feel like as much as I went on about it that it should have not been over looked and maybe there is a reason behind it. So before I get email happy I thought I would ask here. I'm worried this will cause a fuss with the trustee and cost more money. The attorney that we have consulted for the error said my BK could be amended and the money from the sale would be up in the air, but I might be able to keep the money because it would be under a thousand. He mentioned as long as I say something, which I already did previously, that my attorney would be the one held responsible.
Is it that easy? I have no choice but to clear it up or the company will sue me. My case is still open because I'm buying back assets, and man the $690 would help pay it off... Ugh, thanks!
I told my bankruptcy attorney before filing in an email, during, and gave him the attorneys letter (the one saying do it or they will sue), the lease that expires in September (for mineral rights), and so on. Was that suppose to be listed in our bankruptcy as an asset? I own mineral rights below the surface, but I do not own the property. I feel like as much as I went on about it that it should have not been over looked and maybe there is a reason behind it. So before I get email happy I thought I would ask here. I'm worried this will cause a fuss with the trustee and cost more money. The attorney that we have consulted for the error said my BK could be amended and the money from the sale would be up in the air, but I might be able to keep the money because it would be under a thousand. He mentioned as long as I say something, which I already did previously, that my attorney would be the one held responsible.
Is it that easy? I have no choice but to clear it up or the company will sue me. My case is still open because I'm buying back assets, and man the $690 would help pay it off... Ugh, thanks!
Comment