Our attorney has explained to us that since we have nowhere near the necessary monthly income to pay our mortgage (1046.00), the bankruptcy judge will not let us reaffirm the house. We are also underwater on the house (owe 108.000 and house worth 80,000 or even less). We don't want to move b/c we can find nowhere that will take our three dogs (in a rental) that is also in our school district (our daughter has a scholarship to a private school she loves because we live in such a lousy school district). Plus, we tried looking for a rental and it turns out that there isn't one that will take us and the dogs for less than we're paying on the mortgage.
Our attorney has advised us that since we want to stay, but will not be able to reaffirm the mortgage, we should "stay and pay." He said the mortgage would disappear off paper, would go off my husband's credit record, and we would no longer receive statements from Wells Fargo. We understand that we are basically "renting" from the mortgage company without the benefits. We still have to pay the property tax and insurance. My husband is upset because we have lived in the house eight years and will lose all the money we put into the house in payments, plus we will have to give up any equity and will have no right to sell the house, even if we pay off the mortgage in the end. Are we understanding the law correctly?
Our attorney has advised us that since we want to stay, but will not be able to reaffirm the mortgage, we should "stay and pay." He said the mortgage would disappear off paper, would go off my husband's credit record, and we would no longer receive statements from Wells Fargo. We understand that we are basically "renting" from the mortgage company without the benefits. We still have to pay the property tax and insurance. My husband is upset because we have lived in the house eight years and will lose all the money we put into the house in payments, plus we will have to give up any equity and will have no right to sell the house, even if we pay off the mortgage in the end. Are we understanding the law correctly?
Comment