We have an older vehicle without a lien and we are hoping to still be able to claim full ownership expense. has anyone had in luck with the their trustee allowing this on the means test in chp7 or as an expense in chp 13? I found a case in our Circuit that allowed it , but it is from 2008.
"Following the rationale of the Seventh Circuit in In re Ross-Tousey, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25803 (7th Cir. 2008), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that a debtor may claim a ownership expense on the means test even if the debtor does not have an automobile loan or lease payment.*
The Fifth Circuit panel rejected the so-called "IRM approach," in which courts use the methodology of the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) as an interpretive guide for applying the means test. Those courts look not only to the Local Standards, but also to how the IRS uses the Local Standards in its revenue collection process. Under the IRM, if a taxpayer has no car payment, the taxpayer is only entitled to the vehicle operation deduction, not the ownership deduction."
Quznois1
"Following the rationale of the Seventh Circuit in In re Ross-Tousey, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25803 (7th Cir. 2008), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that a debtor may claim a ownership expense on the means test even if the debtor does not have an automobile loan or lease payment.*
The Fifth Circuit panel rejected the so-called "IRM approach," in which courts use the methodology of the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) as an interpretive guide for applying the means test. Those courts look not only to the Local Standards, but also to how the IRS uses the Local Standards in its revenue collection process. Under the IRM, if a taxpayer has no car payment, the taxpayer is only entitled to the vehicle operation deduction, not the ownership deduction."
Quznois1
Comment