The more I look into filing a debtor's Rebuttal of the Presumption of Abuse, the more discouraged I get.
Apparently, the rebuttal is limited to some things called "Special Circumstances", which the Gov't. mainly limits to either a Major Health Issue, or Call to Active Military Duty. I don't know if my Health Issue would qualify, but especially since my wife's income is still there, and is still substantial, and is still almost 2x median.
One answer I read in Case Law was "Debtor could reasonably be expected to reduce living expenses" in the case where a high mortgage payment was limiting the ability to formulate a re-payment plan under 13. The petitioners had offered the high mortgage payment as necessary and a "special circumstance", which the judge denied (this was in Texas).
So am I to assume the UST and Judge will just determine the Totality of Circumstance is such that we should be expected to reduce our living expenses, but that they don't care if its really possible, or HOW it should happen, just that it should happen?!
Nice mess.
Apparently, the rebuttal is limited to some things called "Special Circumstances", which the Gov't. mainly limits to either a Major Health Issue, or Call to Active Military Duty. I don't know if my Health Issue would qualify, but especially since my wife's income is still there, and is still substantial, and is still almost 2x median.
One answer I read in Case Law was "Debtor could reasonably be expected to reduce living expenses" in the case where a high mortgage payment was limiting the ability to formulate a re-payment plan under 13. The petitioners had offered the high mortgage payment as necessary and a "special circumstance", which the judge denied (this was in Texas).
So am I to assume the UST and Judge will just determine the Totality of Circumstance is such that we should be expected to reduce our living expenses, but that they don't care if its really possible, or HOW it should happen, just that it should happen?!
Nice mess.
Comment