Would it makes sense the decreasing the median income may tip the scale for a chapter 13 into a five year plan vs. a three year plan?
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Important BK changes effective 11/1/11 for chapter 7 & 13 filers.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LadyInTheRed View PostThere is no change in how DMI is calculated on the means test. If you can pass the means test before November 1, you can pass the means test after November 1. The decrease in median income will only force more people to complete the means test, not change whether they can pass it. If allowed expenses also decreased, then it would become more difficult to pass the means test.
Well, duh is me! And all that wasted indignation!! LOL I let my indignation lead my post before I fully thought it through.
Thanks for keeping me straight, LITR!~~ Filed Over Median Income Chapter 7: 12/17/2010 ~~ 341 Held: 1/12/2011 ~~ Discharged: 03/16/2011 ~~Not an attorney - just an opinionated woman.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mountanddo View PostWould it makes sense the decreasing the median income may tip the scale for a chapter 13 into a five year plan vs. a three year plan?LadyInTheRed is in the black!
Filed Chap 13 April 2010. Discharged May 2015.
$143,000 in debt discharged for $36,500, including attorneys fees. Money well spent!
Comment
-
Originally posted by LadyInTheRed View PostOriginally Posted by tobee43
you know, they are keeping these changes quiet. i know the bottom line is that too many Americans are filing, so they are changing the rules and making it more difficult for those to try to file
8/4/2008 MAKE SURE AND VISIT Tobee's Blogs! http://www.bkforum.com/blog.php?32727-tobee43 and all are welcome to bk forum's Florida State Questions and Answers on BK http://www.bkforum.com/group.php?groupid=9
Comment
-
Originally posted by Isobel View PostI agree with the others who said it sounds like this is really a marketing letter using scare tactics to drum up business. I wouldn't trust this attorney - sounds like a manipulator. And if he's that desperate to drum up business, he's probably not very good... just my 2 cents!LadyInTheRed is in the black!
Filed Chap 13 April 2010. Discharged May 2015.
$143,000 in debt discharged for $36,500, including attorneys fees. Money well spent!
Comment
-
Well, adding "remember you have to take a class before filing bankrupcy" really doesn't sound very professional either. If I was reviewing his emails I would at least give some sort of explanation....at least explain what kind of class and what it is for!Filed 11/17/11 Chapter 13, 341 meeting 12/21/11. Plan confirmed 1/19/12 - DISCHARGED 12/16/15
Comment
-
Originally posted by LadyInTheRed View PostHe's definitely not a very good attorney. A good attorney would not tell his clients that making over median income will make them inelligible to file a Chap 7.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HHM View PostLet's not be hasty in chastising the attorney, it is a VERY SMALL percentage of cases that are over median and still file chapter 7. And certainly the US Trustee position is that anyone over median is not a 7. The attorney can hedge and say that it is "possible" to be over median and still file chapter 7, but the exceptions are rare and to be fair with you, Mr. Client, you need to go in with the expectation that you will file a chapter 13 bankruptcy.
Let me put it this way - if you are single, and you get the starting salary of the LOWEST paying school district in my area as teacher, you'd be over the state median.
Also, I looked up my state - median income went up by around $1,000 - rats...that would have been $83.33/mo help for me...Last edited by IamOld; 10-25-2011, 06:59 AM.
Comment
-
I am talking nationwide, statistically, very few cases of over median debtors remain chapter 7...but that doesn't mean in some districts, there is no variation.
Understand, there are really only 2 ways to be over median and file chap 7.
1. Non-consumer chapter 7 (business debt case)
2. High secured debt payments, i.e. have a mortgage and car payment, or other special class of obligation, i.e. child support.
I hate when I read on here people saying, so long as your expenses are high, you can be over median and still file 7, that is not true. It is only if CERTAIN expenses are high (but otherwise reasonable) that you can still do a 7 and be over.
For example, an over median debtor with regular living expenses except a $3,000 mortgage, can do a 7 if no DMI. A debtor with regular living expenses, but leases a houses for $3,000, but the housing allowance is only $1,500, will not get a 7.
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment