So, I found out two days after my 341 (which seemed to go well) that there is a presumption of abuse from the UST. Besides being freaked out, I'm a kind of upset because the reason is that on the means test, my attorney had me claiming full operating costs and ownership costs for two cars (though neither car is leased/financed). I ASKED him about this, because I had read on this site (and the No-Lo book) that some districts don't allow any ownership, or they allow only $200 per car. My attorney's response was 'this is how I always do it, sometimes they question it but not usually'. Okay, I'm paying him the big bucks, so I left it.
I had another concern when I met with him the second time to complete the 341 paperwork, and as he figured the means test, he said 'oh, you are above the mean' in a surprised tone, and asked me if my income or anything changed since I had seen him (it had been 6 weeks). Nothing had changed on my end! Still, he seemed to think that even though I came in above the mean for income, my expenses left me with a negative DMI. (This was what I had found, when I did the means test, which is why I was kind of surprised he said I passed the first time we met).
Some of you may remember that I flip-flopped about getting a car before I filed -- my car is 2001 with 195K miles, costing me $1500 a year for repairs, based on last 2 years. The other car has 200K and needs ~$4600 in repairs to make it safe to drive daily (including cat. converter, which I would not fix, but still...) -- it has cost me ~$1500 a year for the last 4+ years (including an accident).
I have submitted evidence from my mechanic to my attorney showing what I have paid to keep these cars running the last two years, plus any repairs currently needed (mine needs timing belt). I also submitted proof of medical expenses -- prescription costs, typical chiropractor visits per year, doctor visits. I submitted proof of what I pay each month for my 4 cats and dog -- 3 cats require prescription urinary tract food, one is diabetic and requires insulin 2X day, syringes, prescription diabetic food -- not counting vet visits, yearly shots, etc., I spend $150 a month.
Sorry -- my question:
If I need to, I will buy a car to help my DMI. Frankly, if I am pushed into a C 13, I would need to buy a car because my car will not last 3-5 years. Can I just buy a car or would I have to get permission from the trustee? I think it would be legitimate, since my car is over 10 years old and 195K miles -- but could it piss the trustee off and encourage them to make my life hell?
Second possibility -- I have a tenant in my basement. They pay $650 (listed as $450 in income, taking out utilities/costs). I am wondering any of the following options would be legitimate, or would they raise flags: i) kick the tenant out, thereby reducing my income by $450, ii) reduce the tenant's rent to $200, reducing income by $400-450, iii) choose not to charge the tenant rent, but let her stay. I don't really want to kick her out, but we are on a month-to-month, and she is looking for a house to buy and so could leave at any time anyway.
Can I make these decisions without input/consulting the trustee?
I am totally freaked out -- this news came at a bad time for me. I'm was trying to get off one med because it's expensive ($125 a month) and causes weight gain, but it has not gone well. I spent a month dealing with the side effects, trying to wait it out -- then got this news and spent 5 days crying hysterically off and on over anything or nothing. I have not been so depressed in a few years. Going back on the med (what else can I do?) because work starts back in 2 weeks and I would not be able to function like that. Of course, there were points during those days when I considered quitting, packing up and moving in with my mom, and just quitting the fight. I did mention in my medical expenses that I really need to be in counseling to help maintain/retain my ability to function.
Anyway, this is the most thinking I've done in days. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
S
I had another concern when I met with him the second time to complete the 341 paperwork, and as he figured the means test, he said 'oh, you are above the mean' in a surprised tone, and asked me if my income or anything changed since I had seen him (it had been 6 weeks). Nothing had changed on my end! Still, he seemed to think that even though I came in above the mean for income, my expenses left me with a negative DMI. (This was what I had found, when I did the means test, which is why I was kind of surprised he said I passed the first time we met).
Some of you may remember that I flip-flopped about getting a car before I filed -- my car is 2001 with 195K miles, costing me $1500 a year for repairs, based on last 2 years. The other car has 200K and needs ~$4600 in repairs to make it safe to drive daily (including cat. converter, which I would not fix, but still...) -- it has cost me ~$1500 a year for the last 4+ years (including an accident).
I have submitted evidence from my mechanic to my attorney showing what I have paid to keep these cars running the last two years, plus any repairs currently needed (mine needs timing belt). I also submitted proof of medical expenses -- prescription costs, typical chiropractor visits per year, doctor visits. I submitted proof of what I pay each month for my 4 cats and dog -- 3 cats require prescription urinary tract food, one is diabetic and requires insulin 2X day, syringes, prescription diabetic food -- not counting vet visits, yearly shots, etc., I spend $150 a month.
Sorry -- my question:
If I need to, I will buy a car to help my DMI. Frankly, if I am pushed into a C 13, I would need to buy a car because my car will not last 3-5 years. Can I just buy a car or would I have to get permission from the trustee? I think it would be legitimate, since my car is over 10 years old and 195K miles -- but could it piss the trustee off and encourage them to make my life hell?
Second possibility -- I have a tenant in my basement. They pay $650 (listed as $450 in income, taking out utilities/costs). I am wondering any of the following options would be legitimate, or would they raise flags: i) kick the tenant out, thereby reducing my income by $450, ii) reduce the tenant's rent to $200, reducing income by $400-450, iii) choose not to charge the tenant rent, but let her stay. I don't really want to kick her out, but we are on a month-to-month, and she is looking for a house to buy and so could leave at any time anyway.
Can I make these decisions without input/consulting the trustee?
I am totally freaked out -- this news came at a bad time for me. I'm was trying to get off one med because it's expensive ($125 a month) and causes weight gain, but it has not gone well. I spent a month dealing with the side effects, trying to wait it out -- then got this news and spent 5 days crying hysterically off and on over anything or nothing. I have not been so depressed in a few years. Going back on the med (what else can I do?) because work starts back in 2 weeks and I would not be able to function like that. Of course, there were points during those days when I considered quitting, packing up and moving in with my mom, and just quitting the fight. I did mention in my medical expenses that I really need to be in counseling to help maintain/retain my ability to function.
Anyway, this is the most thinking I've done in days. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
S
Comment