Those of you who frequent the forums know that I've really been run through the mill
in my Bankruptcy due to the machinations of my ex, his attorney and his good friend the judge.
I need your help, if you have access to some research case law opinions.
I'd like to find as many cases as I can that challenge the rule change under BAPTA
re the nondischargeability of debt owed to an ex spouse in chapter 7.
Specifically, when I read the law or ask lawyers to explain it....they say that any debt or property division as ordered in any separation or divorce agreement or any final ORders are non dischargeable.
I have no problem with that. But my ex claims that YEARS after those final orders that he is owed money from unrelated to property division debt and that THAT should also be non-dischargeable. He doesn't even state what those damages might be...he says only that he wants any debt that I might ever owe him to be nondischargeable for any reason.
I haven't been able to find any attorney who will challenge the Rule change . IN my case,
8 yearrs after the divorce and property settlement , X insisted on selling his and my share of my home to his 'intimate' friend for MUCH less than any other offer including my own offer that was a priority right. After the sale, he took even my bk court awarded homestead exemption (even tho the court ORDERED that it be paid to me.)
And then, he says taht he thinks that I may still owe him more money and that he wants it nondischargeable. I think that when someone insists on 'giving' a Debtor's only asset away, and then claims that because it was given away that he now has no way to collect money that he might have collected if he let the hosue sell to the highest bidder...that he has UNCLEAN hands....and caused the problem.
Oh well..if anyone knows of ANY challenges related to the nondischargeable rule change, please will you post it?????
Thanks!
in my Bankruptcy due to the machinations of my ex, his attorney and his good friend the judge.
I need your help, if you have access to some research case law opinions.
I'd like to find as many cases as I can that challenge the rule change under BAPTA
re the nondischargeability of debt owed to an ex spouse in chapter 7.
Specifically, when I read the law or ask lawyers to explain it....they say that any debt or property division as ordered in any separation or divorce agreement or any final ORders are non dischargeable.
I have no problem with that. But my ex claims that YEARS after those final orders that he is owed money from unrelated to property division debt and that THAT should also be non-dischargeable. He doesn't even state what those damages might be...he says only that he wants any debt that I might ever owe him to be nondischargeable for any reason.
I haven't been able to find any attorney who will challenge the Rule change . IN my case,
8 yearrs after the divorce and property settlement , X insisted on selling his and my share of my home to his 'intimate' friend for MUCH less than any other offer including my own offer that was a priority right. After the sale, he took even my bk court awarded homestead exemption (even tho the court ORDERED that it be paid to me.)
And then, he says taht he thinks that I may still owe him more money and that he wants it nondischargeable. I think that when someone insists on 'giving' a Debtor's only asset away, and then claims that because it was given away that he now has no way to collect money that he might have collected if he let the hosue sell to the highest bidder...that he has UNCLEAN hands....and caused the problem.
Oh well..if anyone knows of ANY challenges related to the nondischargeable rule change, please will you post it?????
Thanks!